Bring your karma
Join the waitlist today
HUMBLECAT.ORG

Blind and Visually Impaired Community

Full History - 2016 - 10 - 08 - ID#56jiom
10
Greetings and question: How can I write better text to describe photographs? (self.Blind)
submitted by johngreenink
Hello Redditors - I write freelance for a website that deals with perfume, the scent industry, and general talk about smell, history of scent, chemistry, etc. I've been trying to make the alt text for images on our pages better when I post them to our text editor, but then I realized I didn't know what makes for the best experience in these cases. For example, if I am posting a photograph of lavender, and this goes in context with a story about the chemical constituents of lavender oil, there are a lot of ways to write alt text. For instance, each of these would be appropriate: Lavender; Bulgarian lavender, Close-up photo of lavender florets, blueish colored lavender from Bulgaria, lavender which has a sweet aroma, lavendula augustafolia, etc. This is actually an easy example. Some are much more difficult. For example, I wrote about an Italian perfumer who lives in Amsterdam, and took a photo that showed some of his lab surroundings, some of his finished work, and some artwork in the background. How should I summarize an image like that?

I know there's no perfect answer here, but I'd love to hear some ideas that would help me write more useful and more sensory alt descriptions so that the images which accompany the writing will give a better sense of the whole. For instance, should the text be a complete sentence? Should it be more concrete or more descriptive?
-shacklebolt- 2 points 6y ago
Opinion:

If an image is an important part of understanding the article (or an important part of selling the product) a reasonably concise level of detail should be added.

If it is not, enough detail to know what is in the photo is sufficient (and if it is purely photo fluff for the article, alt="" may be best.)

For the lavender, "bulgarian lavender florets" would probably be a good compromise, I think. The fact that it is a picture is a given, and the fact that it is a close up is unnecessary detail.

In the case of the perfumer's lab, does the image provide important context that is not in the article? "(Perfumer)'s lab" would be fine if it doesn't. If it does show something important, you could make this a whole sentence. The finished product could be as simple as "lavender perfume" or something. The photo of the art could simply be "art in (perfumer)'s lab" or "art depicting (things) in (perfumer)'s lab" if what the art depicts says something meaningful that is not in the text of the article.

Guidelines:

http://webaim.org/techniques/alttext/

(Also, this is an awesome question! The fact that you're asking it at all means that you're probably getting it right.)
johngreenink [OP] 1 points 6y ago
Thank you so much for this reply, and for all the detail. This is immensely helpful! I've also been learning about other text beyond alt text that is now being used as descriptors to add more details. Cheers!
This nonprofit website is run by volunteers.
Please contribute if you can. Thank you!
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large-
scale community websites for the good of humanity.
Without ads, without tracking, without greed.
©2023 HumbleCat Inc   •   HumbleCat is a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in Michigan, USA.