KillerLag 6 points 5y ago
It's a controversial topic among O&M instructors, but I personally think if someone is interested and willing to put in the effort, they should try. But they also have to realize the limitations. I had a client who was interested in going to the US to get the training, and I was explaining a bit about it to him. He kept saying "But the guys says it is like seeing again!". And I explained that it doesn't reproduce sight, but can give him the ability to sense things from a distance. He did some more research and ultimately decided against the training.
My primary concern is safety, especially in regards to drop offs (stairs and streets). I've had many clients who, getting something that marginally improves their eyesight (new sunglasses, iPhone app, etc), decide they don't need a cane anymore and prompt start tripping on things. Because they believe the item has improved their eyesight significantly, although they don't understand the limitations (often when someone is still partially in denial).
That being said, I've met one person who was born without vision and uses echolocation, and his abilities were astounding. He still used a white cane, but he was able to hear hallways at a greater distance than I thought possible, and was able to avoid people well before his cane encountered them.
Drunken_Idaho 3 points 5y ago
I tend to shake my head when I see these articles come around.
I've been blind since birth and i definitely do use this to some extent, but when I hear people say they can echolocate well enough to detect drop offs and trip hazards I am skeptical.
I can tell if I'm coming up on a wall or if there's an opening into a hallway or a large object, but it definitely isn't like having sight. It is certainly no substitute for a cane.