KillerLag 2 points 5y ago
If you want more information, the device is called Argus II by Second Sight.
http://www.secondsight.com/g-the-argus-ii-prosthesis-system-pf-en.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_retinal_prosthesis
The system implants 60 electrodes into the eye, which connect to the retina. The camera is mounted onto a pair of glasses, which sends the picture to a processing unit (larger than a cell phone, but not too much), which send the signal back to the glasses. The glasses has a transmitter mounted to the side, which sends the signal to the implant in the eye.
For someone who is blind their entire life, it is hard to describe how low resolution those 60 electrodes are. When I described it to a family member for someone who was getting it, I described it like an old TV from the 30s... but much worse.
No options for the glasses as far as I know.
It is now more openly available, if you have the money. Last I heard, it cost $150,000 USD, including the surgery. Not sure if the price has gone down. As far as I know, no medical benefit program covers it, it is still considered too experimental. I remind my clients who are thinking about it, that they are literally guinea pigs for this kind of thing.
For reading.... Of the two clients I've worked with who have had it, none of them were able to read. In theory, it is a possibility, but maybe two or three letters at a time. They were more able to see strong contrast (white sidewalk against darker grass background) and follow the line.
The Argus II is the first step in bionic replacements for eyes... but in terms of functionality, it is like a hook hand from the 1400's. It can do SOME things, but there is a lot it can't do.
EDIT: According to the wikipedia article, Medicare patients are getting reimbursements.
AllHarlowsEve 2 points 5y ago
Honestly, when I see these articles, I wonder if the poster realizes that most of the people on this sub, or at least a sizeable number, are blind. As wonderful as it is to see that science is moving forward, it doesn't help to get articles that have no information.
Professional-Dragon [OP] 1 points 4y ago
Actually some futuristic bionic techniques promise even better vision than 20/20. So even people with "normal" vision can possibly gain something from those in the future. ☺
https://moneyinc.com/the-bionic-lens-could-lead-to-better-than-20-20-vision/
These articles definitely don't include all the minor technical details. But at least they offer some infos; Google can help with the rest (if someone is interested about them). And the technology gets better continually anyway, luckily.
*edit: clarification