Fewer people learning Braille in North America(citynews1130.com)
submitted by fastfinge
bondolo6 points4y ago
The importance and uses of braille have changed in the last 40 years but it is still an important skill for blind people. The article does highlight an important part of the problem; there are fewer teachers of the visually impaired who are qualified to teach braille. To me this is entirely unacceptable, like a doctor who doesn't know anything about lungs. Braille instruction should be available to all visually impaired students. I may not agree with the NFB "Make Braille Great Again" perspective that suggests a return to using Braille for accessing literature and educational reading but use of braille is a necessary key element of literacy for a blind person.
NoFrame63661 points7m ago
Surprised there's fewer teachers for Braille. Had a good friend in elementary who had a blind relative. Learned it at age six and was easy by age seven. Maybe it's harder for adults to learn it. Find it useful again for some reason.
BrailleNomad1 points4y ago
“Fewer teachers of the visually impaired who are qualified to teach braille...”
I don’t think this means what you think it means. There are fewer teachers of the visually impaired. Period. All TVIs are qualified to teach braille. Most of us have at least a year’s worth of braille in school before we graduate; however, TVIs are a critical shortage area throughout the United States, simply because blind/visually impaired is not a subject area that people even realize exists. BVI is such a low-incidence area that people don’t even think about it.
In general, yes, fewer people are learning braille, but I think articles like this are a tad disingenuous. Kids aren’t learning braille because we don’t feel like teaching them braille; kids aren’t learning braille because the demographic of kids that we have now who are visually impaired is waaaay different than the demographic we had a generation ago. Advancements in medical technology means that kids who would not have survived traumatic births *are* surviving now, so:
The most common cause of blindness and visual impairment in children now is cortical visual impairment; most kids with CVI are not candidates for learning braille because they have moderate to significant cognitive involvement. I wish these studies and articles would mention this rather than only pointing out that fewer and fewer kids are learning braille. Well yeah, because more and more kids who are blind have significant and complex disabilities aside from blindness that takes braille off of the table. For the other kids, we absolutely still teach braille.
aaronespinozaca1 points4y ago
"Make Braille Great Again" Ha ha.
gracers946 points4y ago
I think the availability of video magnifiers also contributes to this. Even only about half the students I worked with at a school for the blind used Braille and all the others used magnifiers or iPads and just zoomed in on the text.
-shacklebolt-3 points4y ago
Unfortunately, it's also much cheaper for a school to set up low vision students with a video magnifier than it is to hire teachers capable of teaching braille and produce braille materials for the student. Add on top of that the stigma of braille being for "very blind people" and a lot of students and parents are discouraged from ever learning.
Using primarily magnification as a reading strategy might work excellently for some kids, but I'm sure you know it causes slow reading and eye strain issues in many others. On top of that it provides no way forward if their vision changes as they age.
oncenightvaler5 points4y ago
I am a dedicated Braille user.
I learned Braille over quite a long period probably took me 3 years as an elementary school student to learn contracted Braille, but I could not live without it.
I study literature, and a large part of me thinks that I would not have been so interested in Braille books if my parents and the local library for the Blind and School for the Blind had not helped me out in my personal and academic life.
I love computers and screen readers. I use electronic textbooks and audiobooks frequently. But the ability to make notes on my Perkins Braille, the ability to read embossed books and emboss things I write and using my Display screen (although I have some difficulty with it) are invaluable tools.
I had a discussion a few years back with a blind student who only used Jaws and scanning who said that Braille was obsolete and I have a feeling he could be right soon, but I am an old fashioned luddite.
Anianna1 points4y ago
So much learning is tactile even for sighted individuals. I am a writer and I cannot imagine going through life without being able to write notes. I know there are oral methods of keeping notes now, but I don't think I would be the same writer with only vocal tools. I may not be a writer at all, because I hate the sound of my voice!
AllHarlowsEve5 points4y ago
I was 18 when I lost my vision and I was told that I'd be better off not learning braille, and told very heavy-handedly that I needed to use Jaws. Mind, I told them that I didn't like Jaws and I got nowhere with it, but I was told flat out that it was the only option and that they couldn't teach me to use Mac, NVDA, or any other option.
I learned braille at a center I was shipped off to, and I taught myself to use the mac they had there because it's just *so* much faster and easy to learn. I learned more in a week on the mac by myself than I took in over 3 months of daily instruction.
I also asked for a perkins brailler because I absolutely cannot handle slate and stylus, it just doesn't click in my mind and I have a very hard time with it. I was told I had to do Braille 2 through Hadley before they'd buy me one by my personal resource worker. I was told flat out that I can't get a display unless I go to school, not even just one to borrow for a week or two.
Anianna1 points4y ago
The slate and stylus seems more challenging because after learning all of that braille, you then have to learn it in reverse to use the slate and stylus to write. Literary braille is also a lot more complicated than I imagined when I began trying to learn braille. Words within words - it's like wordception.
AllHarlowsEve2 points4y ago
I'm also dyslexic and have brain damage, so learning grade 1 braille was hard enough, and I was told, as UEB was on the horizon, not to bother with it because there's more north american braille. Just all kinds of disadvantages.
Anianna5 points4y ago
I am curious, is braille an outdated technology at this point, or does it remain a necessary tool for many?
jrs127 points4y ago
People have vastly different views on this depending on who you talk to. Braille is expensive, slow, and takes up a lot of space. If books aren't stored properly, they can be easily damaged. Most humans don't know braille, so using braille on paper can slow down the lines of communication with those that do not know braille. However, exposure to print is a HUGE part of learning to read. I strongly believe that if a child cannot see well enough to read size 24 font in an academic setting, they should be learning braille. Reading is how we learn how words are spelled, how we learn about sentence structure and grammar, and how we learn about worlds beyond us. I think adults should be able to make their own choices regarding if they use braille, but there is still a very real place for it in the world of emerging young readers.
KillerLag6 points4y ago
Not only that, but Braille is important for spelling as well. I've seen university level papers where it was obvious the person dictated it and didn't correct the spelling (so many sun/son or there/their/they're mistakes).
jrs121 points4y ago
Indeed. You only learn those things through exposure to a printed medium.
Anianna1 points4y ago
That makes a lot of sense. How do screen readers handle string conversations where one individual corrects another individual's spelling? In the case of homophones, it would just sound the same both times. Is that confusing for somebody using a screen reader?
Laser_Lens_45 points4y ago
It's still helpful but it's such a nuisance to use compared to what's available on some mainstream tech that it doesn't have nearly as much value. I guess it's still handy if you've got a Braille notetaker but who has 5 grand laying around for one of those these days?
Screen readers are clunky at best and have a neverending list of keystroke commands to memorize. Braille notetakers are specifically designed for non-visual navigation. Doesn't matter. I bought a Galaxy s9+ and a bluetooth keyboard for <$600. Wanna use Voiceover on Apple Products? You can have a Macbook/iMac and a new iPhone for slightly less than what some notetakers cost.
Perhaps you can get a used notetaker. If you want something about a decade old then go ahead. Maybe you want to stick with cheaper Braille on paper? Have fun lugging around your Perkins Brailler and Braille books split into 5 extra thick volumes.
So yeah I'm shitting on Braille. Not because it's outdated, mind you. The problem is how absurdly expensive it is to have. Braille notetakers and displays are great if you have the money.
Anianna1 points4y ago
I have been trying to learn braille as a sighted person and I was pretty shocked by the cost of these items. I was trying to learn how the mechanism works to see if it can be made more cheaply, but I really have no access to the equipment to take it apart and study it. You can make a custom keyboard that works with a computer on the cheap, but that doesn't address the tactile aspect. As I understand it, the readers are a series of pegs that pop up or down depending on what you're typing and it seems to me that can be DIYed cheaply by somebody knowledgable. I have been told that prices of existing equipment are so inflated largely because the government generally pays for it and the system by which the government pays for things promotes abuse of the prices. That's a little oversimplified, but that's the gist of it. There can be little innovation in the field if those capable of innovating it don't have reasonable access to what already exists.
There's also practically no incentive for sighted people to learn braille, so there will always be a disconnect there. I read an article a few months ago that one of the reasons many blind people don't learn braille is largely due to sighted people not producing enough of it. That made me wonder if there are screen readers capable of reading braille visually or other tools that make it easier for blind individuals to produce braille items (something a bit more technologically advanced than the braille typewriters or a board and stylus). Even then, there's still the issue of printing it. So expensive. There has to be a better way.
-shacklebolt-4 points4y ago
I own a braille note taker and use it regularly. I wanted to get only a braille display (as I use my note taker in terminal mode with my iphone primarily) but was able to get a better deal on a secondhand note taker at the time. Pricing is such a huge barrier when you’re an individual buying your own device. Innovative products like the Orbit Reader 20 (which has suffered supply issues) are and hopefully will continue to address that problem.
In terms of volume, I do most of my reading with text to speech. Braille is still incredibly useful for things like being able to read while on the phone or in a meeting, labeling things, or just taking a break from constantly listening to things. I primarily taught myself braille as a young adult, and I’m really glad that I did. When you're older, there are a lot of forces that discourage you from learning braille. Difficulty accessing instruction, negative attitudes from people who believe that adults can't learn braille, plus barriers to getting funding for braille devices, especially if you haven't already learned braille (what a catch-22.)
I think it’s a shame that more blind children aren’t being given access to braille instruction and materials. They’re the ones that could most benefit from knowing how to read and write with braille, and the primary reasons they’re not given acces to braille have nothing to do with what’s best for them. Even if that child doesn’t go on to use braille primarily, it still benefits them to be offered instruction and equal access to materials.
_Night_Wing4 points4y ago
I believe it. I learned braille young but I don't use it. Most people I know don't use braille instead opting for audible or computerized textbooks. Braille books are HUGE.
bradley223 points4y ago
Same here.
I learnt braille young but don’t use it that much.
CynicalDropper3 points4y ago
I think Braille or something like it will be needed for the nearish future for the totally blind, if only in specific cases like office building doors, hotel room numbers, ATMs etc. Although I think all blind and mostly blind children should learn it in school. That said, I am totally OK with skipping paper Braille. My teachers tended to jump around in textbooks, so there were nights I'd have to try and cram 6 or 7 volumes in my backpack along with everything else. There were times that thing weighed in at 35 and 40 pounds on our scale and I was only in grade five. Part of the problem is kids who are visually impaired just don't want to be thought of as blind. I know one person who could barely see a computer monitor at the maximum system magnification but refused to use even ZoomText or a similar dedicated magnifier, so just struggled through. I suspect they're not the only one. Personally I'd like to get a display again, but as others have mentioned most of them are too expensive. If Orbit had ever gotten their crap together and had a steady supply of devices, and the various partners that were all about the OR20 before it came out had stuck with it, we'd be seeing the big display makers investing in R&D to make actually good cheap displays. Still may happen one day, but at this point as far as I know the Orbit is very hard to get except direct from the company. That's fine, except if one is trying to import it, chances are you'll pay almost twice the price in import fees, taxes and the overall shipping cost if customs decides they want some money. I was willing to purchase one from the CNIB store, but they were trying to push a Braille Note Touch, claimed not to have Orbits at all so I just continued with EBooks read via TTS on my mainstream devices instead of fighting them over it.
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large- scale community websites for the good of humanity. Without ads, without tracking, without greed.