This guy is pretty cool. He plays mostly text games, and acts out the voices too!
$1​
If your really an SJW like you say rather than simply a commited activist, than you should know your likely doing more harm to the causes you subscribe too than help on the societal acceptance level. For instance, most trans people when asked feel very misrepresented and used by the LGBTQ+ community and in particular SJW's. Most victories would be hollow shadows because of how forced they were. You'd get people going along with it publically to save face, but hating you and by extension the groups you represent for the way you've force fed it to them. True SJW's reject human nature and want everything done right now as fast as possible, fuck anyone that stands in their way including their own, and who ever can collect the most injustice points or act the most outraged wins.
It's often a highly narcissistic, self congratulating form of activism which likely stems from feelings of no control. Understandable in this world and with the media riling people up for views... But still not acceptable.
No one likes a loud, prejudgemental asshole. And yes, even though some groups have it worse, you can still be racists/sexist/what ever even if you stand up for the little guy, and end up becoming a mirror image of exactly what you hate, without even realizing it before it's too late because of the aforementioned echo chamber.
And refusing to listen to dissenting opinion doesn't make you look committed. It makes you look weak, as if you know your position is tenuous and wouldn't stand up to scrutiny. I can understand not wanting to be hounded about it constantly or having to defend everything you say, but you were the one who came out swinging. You don't get to dish it out and then expect not to take it right back.
So advertizing that your actively siding with this kind of movement is kinda stupid IMO... After all even though the majority and minority are not at parody so putting one over the other isn't going to cause an immediate power shift like fox news will have you believe, it's still not a good attitude to have (one person is more deserving/better/more valuable because of a non skill related trait) there by inevitably devaluing the other, and can easily spiral out of control down the road.
If you really want to get people to accept what they don't know, you need to break down barriers and let them see the echo of humanity in it, so that they can empathise and therefore try to understand it better. We understand love, so two gay men getting married makes sense from that angle when you take the (uncontrollable) biological repulsion out of it, show how normal these people's lives are outside of the bedroom, and discredit those making wild claims about the supposedly outsized impact, "homosexuality spreading like a plague or being the only cause of AIDS".
I mean preferring LGBT/POC to straight/white is already kind of telling, as it gives the impression that your putting one group over another simply because of traits which are A. out of their control and B. not at all relevant to the medium, but in the end, you watch what you want.
Also keep in mind, not everyone wears their personal life on their sleeve for extra views or just confidence. Half those people you listen too could easily be gay/bi/asexual/pansexual but you wouldn't know it because they don't feel the need to scream it from the rooftops. It doesn't define them, nor do they take advantage of the current political climate to disproportionately increase there viewership.
Frankly, what we need is less shallow groupism and outrage culture, not more. This road is one paved with good intentions, but it goes directly to hell, just by another rout, and your (decent human beings) comment is a perfect example of how it's shaped you already.