scrubadubadubadub [OP] 2 points 3y ago
Thank you. This is extremely helpful and even If i may not change anything with my designs and awareness, it has been an awesome journey learning about all these things. I hope you have a great day and I thank you again for this helpful advice.
scrubadubadubadub [OP] 1 points 3y ago
>Knife guides are possibly valuable for newly blind people who still wish to cook, but they should only be considered a temporary crutch if it can at all be helped. There are multiple techniques and methods for chopping safely as a visually impaired person which already exist and require no extra tools, but knuckle guards and non slip cutting boardsare already soled in the mainstream market if they are helpful.
>
>Burns are similarly quite easy to avoid with common sense and patients in most cases. Yes, it takes training or trial and error, but even touching most food while it's cooking shortly doesn't cause a burn, and touching even the inside of a hot pan unless it's full of extremely hot frying oil rarely does mroe than cause a slightly painful singe that is forgotten within a few hours at most.
>
>Grippy tongs, long silicone oven mitts with textured hand grips, dual handled frying pans, splatter guards, these things already exist and can help us augment our other skills and techniques if necessary.
>
>So designing new tools isn't really what's needed for the most part, unless your making what already exists cheaper and more available, such as talking thermometers. No what we really need are simple improvements to existing devices.
>
>Touchscreens with no raised lines or small dips/bubbles to feel when you've moved from one button to another, and dials that spin for ever and have no stops at either end can fuck right off, along with those controls on some ovens where you don't even touch them but use gestures near the surface.
>
>When changing a value such as temperature, there should always be beeps for each press, and ideally, different sounds/pitched beeps for reaching the minimum and maximum setting. If you can use easily differentiated tones for other controls so that you don't get them mixed up, that's even better. E.G. temperature and time sound different from each other in some way.
>
>Having long alert beeps for preheat temperature being reached (even if the oven was already on and you've since changed the temperature) are also important, and a clear way of knowing when the oven has been turned on or off is vital for safety.
>
>Click stops for dials are great especially if it's only for common increments such as every 25F past 250.
>
>Having a physical pointer embossed into or shaped into knobs, witha clear difference between one end of the pointer and the other (such as a sharp taper) really helps too.
>
>With flush stove tops which have no traditional burners (such as on induction cookers) having a tactile ring helps us to center pots. It doesn't need to be anything much, just something we can feel like a dotted line or tiny ridge around each one, nothing tall enough to truly interfere with the smoothness.
>
>Ideally, the most important settings/numbers around the outside of the dial (the non moving part) would be engraved, have small dots or raised lines, or even better, have braille labels on them, which should be allot mroe common than it is with the advent of 3D printing.
>
>Most of these things apply equally to toaster ovens, microwaves, ETC as well.
>
>Standardizing the use of braille on measuring cups and measuring spoons (such as on the handle just before the bowl part) is a long time coming, but still isn't there yet sadly.
>
>When ever orientation is important for proper usage, any orientation markings, arrows ETC should be tactile as well, and preferably located in an obvious place on the device.
>
>Any physical buttons/switches should have their identification symbols made tactile, either via engraving or raised print.
>
>Packaging should be marked when possible in some way to show which side should be opened, as it isn't always obvious. Standardizing the marking/location would help with this allot.
>
>I can't think of any more right now but I know I'm only just scratching the surface. Look at what some countries in Europe are doing and you will see how pathetically far behind other supposedly civilized countries are. At this point, these things should be a standard part of the manufacturing process chain, and not even questioned at all, but apparently stamping out the likely insignificant additional costs of doing this is worth the time of corporate lobbyists and pencil pushers, and government officials are willing to take their word for it instead of funding research on the issue for them selves. Yes, not all materials necessarily make this possible, but more than you might think, and with people actually bothering to try I think we could find alternative methods.
>
>In the end, the most important thing is to get experienced blind cookings to do in depth physical testing for you, weather at home or in test kitchens with a range of scenarios and vision levels, and to take their advice into major consideration when developing solutions.
>
>Thanks for your interest and good luck. I doubt your work will change anything as it's been this way for far, far too long, but even if I just educate you and possibly cause you to become interested in helping solve these problems, it's worth my time already.
hey mate, would it be ok if i quoted some of your paragraphs in my coursework? i will write you account name and quote it from you if that is ok. would really help me out.
vwlsmssng 1 points 3y ago
Gorenje did an interesting project where they used silicone cutouts to identify the active portions of an induction hob.
https://www.gorenjegroup.com/en/media/news/2017/03/7596-Gorenje-donates-a-cooking-hob-adapted-for-blind-and-partially-sighted-persons
However I don't think that hob with tactile rotary controls is still available.
The Smeg "Victoria" range of induction hobs have tactile rotary controls that offer good feedback. That's the only one I know of.