Bring your karma
Join the waitlist today
HUMBLECAT.ORG

Blind and Visually Impaired Community

Full History - 2020 - 02 - 26 - ID#fa0zqk
0
Is the word 'visually impaired' inappropriate? (self.Blind)
submitted by yestext
A friend of mine (sighted) works in a firm that makes accessibility software for people with vision disabilities. Recently, they told me that recently someone contacted their office because they used the term 'visually impaired' in an email (or blog post... I am not sure). The person said something along the lines of "'visually impaired' by definition would mean that the item or person referred to is “ ugly “ or does not look like what normal is perceived to be."

I am not sure what they said exactly, but when my friend told me about this, I was a bit surprised. Because I never thought that this could be a possible interpretation of the word 'visually impaired'

Any thoughts on this?
UltimoBro 8 points 3y ago
That person is just totally misinterpreting. The term doesn’t refer to the visual that the subject presents to others, but rather the acuity of the vision of the subject. So they’re twisting the term and getting offended over their own misunderstanding
retrolental_morose 7 points 3y ago
I've been advised to use "vision impaired".

I just tell people I'm blind and leave it at that. Life's far too short.
bscross32 5 points 3y ago
An impairment is generally a weakening or diminishing of something. We can say that doing certain drugs, drinking alcohol, and depriving ourselves of sleep impair our judgement and reaction times. So if we consider legal blindness to be at the line of 20/200 in the US, then anything under that is an visual impairment. You could even say that without glasses, your vision is impaired, because it is a reduction or diminishing of vision as compared to what is normal for you.

​

People just want to be offended and have that spot light on themselves. Life's too short for that shit. I tell people I'm blind even though visual impaired is more correct. It's the same reason we just say, "fine, thanks", when someone asks how you're doing. They are just accustomed to the social construct and don't want your life story. So, unless someone wants more - and I'm happy to elaborate in such cases - I just say I'm blind. It's close enough at any rate. My usable vision is not good for much of anything really.
CloudyBeep 4 points 3y ago
It's only considered offensive in Australia (see item 20 on this list for the rationale): https://www.bca.org.au/history/
jmosen 2 points 3y ago
I think this is another example of knowing your audience. If you’re appealing to a global market, don’t use visually impaired. I’m not in Australia, I’m in New Zealand but I also agree that visually impaired implies to me that there’s something wrong with the way you look.
If someone was trying to market a product to me claiming I am a visually impaired person, I would probably not buy the product. It’s no different from terms about race that may be acceptable in some countries but not others. So, it all depends on how much the company wants international business.
That said, I would dispute that visually impaired is a term that enjoys universal acceptance in the United States. The last US company I worked for had a style guide, and their preference after consultation was to use the term blind to describe someone who couldn’t see, and low vision for those with...well...low vision.
oncenightvaler 2 points 3y ago
So I have a few local blind friends and we have adopted the term "blinks"

Then again we also call ourselves four blind mice sometimes so what do we know?
noaimpara 1 points 3y ago
No what the hell. I am visually imapired. The best way to describe myself is this, I’ll always use this.
botmaster69420lol 1 points 3y ago
I'm am "visually impaired" and I find this offensive
Space50 1 points 3y ago
I think there are blind people who don't like "visually impaired" and prefer "blind" much like there are deaf people who don't like being called "hearing impaired".
Sanders_for_Chicken 1 points 3y ago
I think it was meant to be a joke. “Visually impaired” as in the person’s looks are bad (eg visually unpleasant, ugly)

Versus “visually impaired” as in “does not see well”

Not a great joke, for sure, but I can’t believe anyone would say that and be actually serious. More likely someone trying to make a joke about today’s “outrage culture” that has to find something that offends them at least once a day!
80percentaccurate 1 points 3y ago
I was a member of a Facebook group where a lady insisted we change the group name for exactly this reason. She refused to listen to anyone stating that here in the United States, visually impaired is not an offensive term. She ended up leaving the group over the issue. She was Australian and she insisted that this term was offensive there. I’m not sure if that’s true or not.
CloudyBeep 2 points 3y ago
Blind Citizens Australia campaigned for the change in terminology (see item 20 on this list): https://www.bca.org.au/history/
80percentaccurate 2 points 3y ago
u/CloudyBeep coming through for the win. So what do we do about this on places like the Internet where there may be people from Australia? I feel like culturally it’s no problem in the US, and if I were in Australian I would say vision impaired. What should be done when it’s a blend of cultures though?
CloudyBeep 1 points 3y ago
I would say that it's up to whoever created the Facebook group and whatever is normally used in their country. "Visually impaired" is acceptable in most of the world, the only other place where it's not regularly used being the UK, where "partially sighted" is the preferred term. If a person is unable to cope with the name of a group, I'd hate to think of how they act towards people with different views to themselves on more divisive and important issues.
80percentaccurate 2 points 3y ago
Kind of my thoughts as well. Every once in awhile I get into the ‘dog guides’ or ‘guide dogs’ debate which I feel is silly. It seems as though the academic community insists on saying dog guides because it aligns with the term human guide, which they want people to use instead of sighted guide since a guide could have no vision at all and still assist someone. The guide dog schools all call themselves guide dogs though and the dogs aren’t going to be offended so I fail to see the problem. I guess I’ll keep trucking along matching terminology whenever people use it and saying sorry when I get it wrong.
[deleted] 1 points 3y ago
[deleted]
BlueRock956 0 points 3y ago
‎This is a FB post from a friend: Just a personal thought this morning: when I hear the term "visually impaired," I think of limitations placed on one's life due to the lack of eyesight or vision; however, when the individual learns that it is acceptable to be blind and utilize the tools and propper training, they are not impaired. This is why I do not consider myself visually impaired. I am blind and it doesn't matter what I can see or not see. I have the tools and propper training to live the life I want independently and for that I am greatful!
4 Comments
18 reactions
React
(two finger double tap to interact with this post), 9:01AM, ‎Sent
bradley22 0 points 3y ago
Visually impaired, simply means that the vision, eyesight, is lacking.
This nonprofit website is run by volunteers.
Please contribute if you can. Thank you!
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large-
scale community websites for the good of humanity.
Without ads, without tracking, without greed.
©2023 HumbleCat Inc   •   HumbleCat is a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in Michigan, USA.