Im probably not going to turn into a movie.
I get audio description does that, but to which end. And I feel like since its produced separate from the overall director-led production process, its fundamentally a different experience. (im obviously biased and looking at this as a sight led person)
Take for example the raft by bill viola. Its a 10 minute visual of a diverse group of about a dozen people standing in front of a dark backdrop. Some casually reading from a book, listening to music, or just plain standing there. It's like theyre on a train or something. A few people here or there, enter the frame and people make space for them. At the halfway mark gallons of water are thrown at them from the side of the frame in HYPER-SLOW MOTION. It's like a fire hydrant just popped open and everyone's reacting how you normally would when gallons of water are forcefully shot out at you. An elderly woman takes a hard fall - people cling on to eachother for dear life - people try to shield themselves with their shoulders. Soon the whole frame is just filled with this gushing water and you can barely see the people in the shot. Everyone is just dark blue silhouettes.
Anyway, I watch this and I think to myself - is this piece of art, inherently visual? Can it be translated? And if the director had thought, I want to make this accessible to a visually impaired person, what would they do?
Here is the link to the visual
$1