Question about ableism in the context of an art technique/concept that is based on Braille?(self.Blind)
submitted by AmongstMonks
Some background: a good friend of mine is a studio artist, and one time a few years he got invited to be in a show of only collaborative pieces. I write a lot of poetry, so he contacted me about writing something that would then be integrated into the piece. We came up with what we called “flat Braille”, wherein text is translated into Braille (we used a big book on Braille translation from the university library and just translated one letter at a time) and then the pattern of the Braille is painted onto a flat canvas. I wrote a short poem, he did the rest of the painting, and it was actually a pretty big hit at the gallery. It was a one-off using the flat Braille idea, and I’ve only ever thought of it as an innocuous, honestly kind of silly piece.
However, recently some people have said it’s problematic and ableist since it appropriates a system that blind folks use and rely on. One person even said we were making fun of the blind, which honestly shocked me. For years me and my friend had never once thought the piece invited such negativity into the world, but these people were saying it did. I wanted to get a blind person’s perspective on this, and figured Reddit was as good a place as any to try. What do you guys think? Is the painting problematic? If the consensus is yes, we’ll destroy it no question.
Tl;dr: made a painting that involves Braille, was told it’s offensive, wanted to check with people in the blind community.
rp-turtle11 points3y ago
My only problem with it is that blind people can’t enjoy the art too. Like another commenter said, it’s a little messed up when something is created in Braille but blind people can’t even access it because it’s flat. I think it’s more rude than offensive. That being said, I don’t see the need to destroy it. Just find a way to include rather than exclude blind people. I know you didn’t mean to exclude blind people on purpose or anything. Pretty much no one ever does so intentionally. Still, the current piece is exclusionary to a community it pulls from so that should be addressed. Otherwise, sounds like a cool painting and idea.
AmongstMonks [OP]3 points3y ago
I think the plaque idea that another user posted about is the best way forward. Not only does it give the blind access to the piece, they have a leg up on everyone else because they know what the painting says, while it remains a mystery to everyone else. A rule of the painting since its creation is that even if you know it, you cannot tell others what the poem actually says—everyone has to figure it out on their own.
Edit: for what it’s worth, the title is “How to Read a Poem With Your Eyes Closed”
rp-turtle2 points3y ago
I agree. I think that’s a great idea. I only commented to add my voice to the chorus and urge blindness inclusivity in art - especially pieces that pull from the community directly such as those using Braille.
AmongstMonks [OP]1 points3y ago
The whole separate issue of how to make your art more accessible for the sight-impaired generally is a fascinating question, my buddy and I started to discuss it today after the responses this post got. We figure you have two basic approaches: emphasize a tactile element, a sound element, or both. The tactile could be something that the visitor reaches out and uses their hands to interact with, or something more passive like blowing air or misted water. The sound could be any number of things, like music, ambient noises, a live or recorded voice, etc.
Any other thoughts on this are greatly appreciated.
rp-turtle2 points3y ago
Sight impaired is a very odd term that I’ve never heard another blind person nor anyone who’s ever worked with the blind use. Blind is in the name of all our major organizations. Blind is the correct term. Visually impaired works too but some people see that as referring to a group of people with some functional vision but others see it as also referring to blind peiple.
I think the interactive features are pretty cool but they definitely need to come with a warning. I would be super annoyed if I approached a piece and I suddenly got water sprayed in my face without any warning lmao. It’s not like I can see the water spraying device as I approach or anything. I think the best thing is using both tactile and audio elements when possible obviously. A description of the piece would probably be the most useful upon initially approaching so I can get an initial idea of what I’m looking at. The description could also include whomever created the piece so that it best reflects their original vision if possible too. I like the idea of relevant ambient noises too but the description should be the highest priority from the audio perspective. There’s quite a few blind friendly art exhibits and stuff out there. I am sure you can find them after a google and see what techniques they use.
Laser_Lens_46 points3y ago
Let me guess; the people who were getting offended weren't blind? Thanks for comng here to ask us about it instead of simply taking it down without question.
​
I wouldn't go as far as saying it's offensive, though flat Braille has always annoyed me since Braille is primarily meant to be read via touch by people who can't see. Destroying a painting sounds needlessly wasteful. Maybe compromise and add a plaque on the side with proper Braille so blind people can enjoy it as well? That's what I'd do. No need to destroy art someone put effort into.
AmongstMonks [OP]5 points3y ago
Ah i like the plaque idea a lot actually, even more so because then any blind folks who do interact with it can then be “in” on the joke and know what the poem actually says and be a step ahead of everyone else. Seems like a win-win.
noaimpara4 points3y ago
Being offended on the behalf of blind people is the most offensive thing anyone could do.
Just have a plaque next to it with actual braille and call it a day. I’m sure the art is great.
80percentaccurate2 points3y ago
So ‘flat braille’ actually has a place in the blind community. It’s called sim braille and is used to teach sighted teachers braille. It can be problematic because it does leave out the very people you’re trying to help, but it does exist. One mistake people often make when translating braille on their own is not caring about the position of the dots as much as they should. It makes for a neat piece, but can make the braille really hard to read because even slight changes in the dot position can cause the braille to mean something totally different. That being said, I don’t think you did anything wrong. There should be a description of the piece so that all can enjoy, but that’s all.
oncenightvaler1 points3y ago
fun fact: I know a sighted artist who made Braille cross stitch of Bible verses (still haven't figured out which one I want to commission it from her)
As to your Braille painting it's a cool idea but I don't think a blind person themself could actually read the Braille if it were only painted unless you used the special puff paint or did really hard raised lines, besides I know touching a canvas is taboo. Perhaps you could contact this friend again and brainstorm how to do a Braille painting that could be enjoyed by the blind, but the concept itself is not ableist and I disagree most of the times that word is used.
further fun fact: If you ever want to do more Braille art perhaps you could contact Elegant Insights Braille Creations though they might want you to also study the Contracted Braille.
AmongstMonks [OP]1 points3y ago
Other users mentioned having a tasteful metal plaque with actual Braille, next to where the name card would normally go on a gallery wall. This Braille would have the usual stuff name cards have (name of the piece, the names of the artists, materials used, year created, etc.) and then underneath that it would have the Braille as it it appears on the canvas. I like it because any blind person who came up and read the plaque would be further along than all the other visitors, because they would know what the poem actually says and are therefore in on the joke. Rule #1 of the painting is if you know what the poem says, you cannot share with anyone else. Everyone has to figure it out on their own.
PungentMushrooms1 points3y ago
I think you and the people who are telling you that the painting is problematic are overthinking this.
What I'm interested in is what kind of reactions did the peace get out of it's viewers? Like, what did people get out of it?
bradley221 points3y ago
I’m sure you know we wouldn’t be able to read the braille.
As for ableism, the only people who know what’s “ableist” are the people them selves.
Personally I think this ableist idea is taken to far sometimes.
DrillInstructorJan-2 points3y ago
I have no opinion on this but I would point out that you used the words "ableist," "problematic" and "appropriates" in the same sentence, which is usually something that only overweight, blue-haired gender studies graduates do when they're composing a 500 word tumblr rant about how offended they are at something that doesn't really affect them.
Based solely on that, you are probably overthinking this. But hey, you could do the painting in some sort of raised dots, and then nobody would have a problem with it. Find the video where the guy invites his date out by spelling the word PROM in chocolate kisses, it's really cute. And stay away from social justice warriors, I doubt anyone cares.
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large- scale community websites for the good of humanity. Without ads, without tracking, without greed.