saizai [OP] 3 points 2y ago
~~To what extent is it about being blind per se, vs about … inferring from the reviews, I guess a mystery or family drama of some sort?~~
ETA: Two chapters in (yay BARD — DB 79575), I can confirm that
1. the narrator & primary character is a blind teen girl who's competent (e.g. fluent with VoiceOver, realistic abilities and limitations)
2. the plot is not about blindness; it's so far to do with finding the narrator's missing father, and
3. in IMO a positive sign, the first tell of the narrator's blindness was a natural inline mention of VoiceOver speed.
So, u/JennyReason, your recommendation is exactly within what I requested. Thank you!
ETA 2: I've now finished the book.
The primary character, despite having only light perception, has zero cane usage, relies on her kid brother to navigate, and tries to pass as sighted. Boo.
Also, her description of NYC at 4:19:00 (to another character) — 100% sound based — is an extremely sightie reductive stereotype. Especially in NYC! Sound is a major thing, yes, but it's not even the majority IMO. Smell, wind, air pressure, vibration, pavement texture, heat patterns, humidity, etc etc… stuff sighties never think about but make up a huge amount of the sensory experience.
That said, I think that the book is reasonably accurate of the type of experience it portrays (though omfg, get this girl a cane!); it's solidly in the unapologetic "yeah I'm blind so what" camp (good); the vast majority of it is not about blindness, but rather about the philosophy of synchronicity / coincidence and a trek to find her novelist father, with some light elements of magical realism.
For the most part, the author seems to not use as much sensory language as would be typical of a novel of this type. What they do use is reasonable enough, and they include good snapshot details like how one handles paper, but it seems… missing a huge amount of detail that the narrator surely would have noticed, and whose visual analogues would have been written out, but the author doesn't know about them so they're just omitted. It feels oddly disembodied as a result.
So I'd say that overall it feels like a pretty good job by a sighted person who's done their homework on specific details on a case by case basis but has not, fundamentally, been able to put themselves in the sensory place of a blind person overall — and has crippled the main character by depriving her of a cane, without explanation.