amh_library 2 points 2y ago
I found another JSTOR article about Automobiles and Blind Pedestrians from 1929. When people back then were figuring out how to deal with cars. I pasted the first paragraph from the article because it is unique to that time.
Automobiles: Rights of the Blind in Streets
Michigan Law Review
Vol. 27, No. 8 (Jun., 1929), pp. 948-949 (2 pages)
Published by: The Michigan Law Review Association
AUTOMOBILES-RIGHTS OF THE BLIND IN STREETS.-The plaintiff, a blind man, while crossing a street unattended and without a cane became excited, turned, ran back, and was struck by the defendant's automobile. The trial judge instructed the jury that if the plaintiff "was unable to see and was not accompanied by one who could see" he was guilty of contributory negligence, and refused the plaintiff's requested instruction that "the blind have as much right to the use of the streets as those who have possession of their faculties, and it is not negligence as a matter of law for a blind person to walk unattended, either without a companion or a cane, on a public street." Held, the plaintiff's requested instruction was a correct statement of the law. Weinstein v. Wheeler (Or. I928) 271 Pac. 733.