Bring your karma
Join the waitlist today
HUMBLECAT.ORG

Blind and Visually Impaired Community

Full History - 2022 - 05 - 02 - ID#uh5zyk
1
My Photography, And Dealing With Imposter Syndrome (self.Blind)
submitted by Neapola
I'll put the TL;DR up front: I'm legally blind, even with glasses. $1.

I apologize in advance for the wall of text that follows, but I don't usually talk about my vision, and certainly not the struggles that come with it, so I'm not sure how much needs to be explained, even in a sub like this.

I've always felt a bit self conscious about being a legally blind guy with a camera. I know I shouldn't, but I do. I suppose it's a case of Imposter Syndrome. Sometimes, I look at my photography and feel like a fraud, because my camera captures images that are better than what I actually see. Other times, I feel frustrated by how much better my photography could be if I had decent vision. Most of the time though, I just enjoy photography, and that's what matters.

**My Vision:**

With glasses, vision in my better eye is 20/200. My other eye is closer to 20/250, maybe even 20/300. I have ocular albinism which includes nystagmus, astigmatism, pretty bad sensitivity to light, poor depth perception, and a partridge in a pear tree. It is what it is, and it's all I've ever known.

For the fully sighted folks who may read this post, here's what the number 20/200 means, at least in theory: If I can see something from a distance of 20 feet, you can see it clearly from 200 feet. I say "in theory" because vision is weird. Sometimes, I feel like I can see better than that number suggests. Other times, not even close. And sometimes I'm wrong about what I think I see.

**My Website:**

I bought the domain name $1 on a whim because it was available and I was feeling brave, but I don't explain what the name means anywhere on my site... so... so much for bravery.

I designed my site myself, including the logo (which is dead simple). I even wrote the code for my site by hand in a text editor. Old school! Web design is just a hobby though.

**My Photography:**

I'm a street photographer, but I don't take pictures of scenes or people. I capture details such as $1, $1, $1, etc, usually shot close up or zoomed way in, meaning that it's captured out of a broader context.

I make no attempt to have a style, and I'm not trying to prove anything. I just enjoy photography as a creative outlet.

**My Cameras:**

I own an Olympus Pen F and EM1, along with various M4/3 lenses.

Micro 4/3 cameras have a 2X crop factor. Without getting bogged down in a technical conversation about equivalence, let's just say a 50mm lens on M4/3 is like a 100mm lens on a full frame camera. Think of it like scaling down your monitor to make everything bigger.

Micro 4/3 cameras are mirrorless, which means they have electronic viewfinders. Electronic viewfinders can do things traditional camera viewfinders can't, such as digital zoom and digital magnifier. The purpose of the magnifier is to help check if a photo is in focus, but I use it more like binoculars, which isn't the purpose of the feature at all, but it helps me a lot. I have digital zoom and magnifier assigned to buttons on my cameras and I use them constantly.

For someone like me with poor vision, these things are a huge benefit since I always want a bigger, closer view.

**My Struggles:**

Focusing. Thank god for autofocus, because I can't do manual focus. Even with autofocus, I struggle.

Indicators. I shut off non-essential indicators and symbols in the viewfinder because I can't see them. I also shut off most of the info displayed on the camera's rear monitor because I can't see it well enough to use when I'm out shooting. And since street photography is what I do... I can't use indicators I can't see, so... eff 'em.

Exposure. Oof, I struggle, but bracketing helps. Bracketing is a feature where a camera takes identical shots in rapid fire, with some under-exposed, and some over-exposed.

Lines: I love shooting things like stripes & patterns on a grid. I have no idea why, but things like that appeal to me. I can't see well enough to get them lined up straight though. How do I do it? I'll take the same shot a bunch of times & find out if I got the shot when I see it on a real monitor at home. Olympus cameras do a great job of image stabilization, and that helps a lot.

Editing: I use Lightroom Classic. I like it, but I hate that I can't change the frigging text size for the UI. And of course, I struggle with seeing things well enough to know if my editing is any good, so there's that. Again, ah well. I'm doing the best I can with what I've got... but don't mistake any of what I just said for complacency. I'm always trying to improve.

**One More Thing, And It's A Biggie:**

I was inspired to write this post because I've been thinking about how my photography misrepresents what I'm able to see and what I'm not.

In summer 2020, I took a lot of pictures of Portland protests, and especially the federal response to the protests. That's not the kind of photography I normally do, but this is my home and it felt important to be there.

I didn't realize what I'd captured $1 until I got home and looked at it on a monitor. At the time, I only picked up my camera to zoom in so I could figure out why the guy ahead of me stopped and put his hands up.

In $1, I captured exactly what I wanted to, but the second line of police were too far away for me to see at the time, and they're an important part of the shot.

Sometimes, I'll look at a photo and think "Do I explain how I took $1" The answer is "No" since that photo isn't about me, but I can't help feeling awkward about the difference between what I see and what I capture with a camera.

In terms of my photography, the only thing that matters to me is the photo itself, but I can't help feeling a sense of inauthenticity when a photo misrepresents what I was truly able to see.

As an aside: I love using photography as inspiration for writing. Here's one of my favorite stories from the summer 2020 protests: *$1*.

**Closing thoughts:**

Photography is just a hobby for me, but I love it. Someday, I'd be thrilled to have a gallery showing of my work, but I'm nowhere near being good enough. And that's fine. I do this because I enjoy it.

I haven't decided whether to post this in r/photography. I'm a bit leery of where conversations about vision would go there. Sigh.

**P.S.**

If you have enough vision to use a camera and you have an interest in photography, I'd enthusiastically encourage you to give it a try. Creativity sets the mind free.
thebrightworker 1 points 1y ago
even those people with perfect vision who happen to be photographers don't actually see everything they are photographing. granted they would have seen more things than you did, it doesn't mean they would have seen it all. in fact, no one can really take in every detail of a scene all at once. maybe one or two savants can, but otherwise, no chance. it's a bit like listening to a piece of music, even with superb hearing, it's likely that replaying it repeatedly will reveal more and more detail each time than was missed during earlier listens.

then there's the fact that cameras can zoom in, take extremely high-resolution images, etc.. so a photo might show the individual pores on someone's face that you just wouldn't notice normally and even on a small screen would probably be imperceptable until viewed on a bigger screen. then photographers do things in post, after the photo is taken, to tweak it and reveal details that weren't visible before.

you mentioned not having a particular style that you strive for, but it felt like you have a style, it was nice and i appreciated the images i viewed.
Neapola [OP] 1 points 1y ago
> even those people with perfect vision who happen to be photographers don't actually see everything they are photographing.

I'm sure you're right, but I can't imagine what someone with 20/20 vision sees, compared to me. And to be honest, I don't even want to know what somebody with 20/20 vision can see compared to me, because I try to be thankful for what I have rather than regretful about what I don't. I tend to be an optimistic guy.

> you mentioned not having a particular style that you strive for, but it felt like you have a style, it was nice and i appreciated the images i viewed.

Thanks! I just meant that I don't take pictures of details because I'm trying to be different, or for the sake of a style. I just shoot things that interest me.
TechnicalPragmatist 1 points 1y ago
That actually sounds pretty cool I don’t think you should let it make you feel guilty? I don’t see why you shouldn’t have just as much of a right to do it as anyone else. I know some people who are totally blind who even want and do to an extent try their hand at it. From what I heard last for totally blind people they don’t do a bad job at it.
This nonprofit website is run by volunteers.
Please contribute if you can. Thank you!
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large-
scale community websites for the good of humanity.
Without ads, without tracking, without greed.
©2023 HumbleCat Inc   •   HumbleCat is a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in Michigan, USA.