Friendly reminder that all **top level** comments must:

1. start with "answer: ", including the space after the colon (or "question: " if you have an on-topic follow up question to ask),

2. attempt to answer the question, and

3. be unbiased

Please review Rule 4 and this post before making a top level comment:

http://redd.it/b1hct4/

Join the OOTL Discord for further discussion: https://discord.gg/ejDF4mdjnh


*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.*

Answer: a whistleblower named David Grusch, who was formerly a representative to the USA's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, came forward in June alleging that the US government had recovered intact non-human spacecraft and the bodies of their pilots. He has also alleged that the secretive program in charge of the captured non-human material has murdered US citizens in order to keep their activities secret.

In order to legally act as a whistleblower, Grusch first had to clear all the information he planned to publicly reveal with the US government to ensure that no classified information would be exposed, which they allowed. This could indicate that Grusch has revealed legitimate, non-classified information, but could also indicate that his claims were not classified because they do not relate to an existing government program.

~~After Grusch gave testimony to Congress~~ [Official hearings are scheduled for later this month] After hearing Grusch's story, Senator Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment that would create a commission with the ability to declassify government records related to this topic, which is modeled after a similar commission created to declassify information related to the JFK assassination. This amendment is likely to pass and become law as part of an upcoming defense spending bill.

Up to this point, no evidence other than individual testimony related to Grusch's claims has been released. Grusch says that he has seen evidence (images and reports) that back up his claims, but that they are classified and cannot be publicly released.

Answer: A little more than a month ago, a former intelligence official named David Grusch came forward as a whistleblower, making claims that there have been ongoing secret UAP craft retrieval and reverse engineering programs hidden inside the US military establishment. He also claimed that certain government entities are in possession of crashed craft, and eve that alien bodies were found. These programs have been clandestine and have been operating away from congressional oversight.
What makes David Grusch very different is that he is one of the most credible individuals that has ever come forward on this topic. He has been very careful to go through all the right channels, because in his position, a lie can cost him many years in jail. So this is not about angling for a book deal or a TV show. His credibility has been checked and validated and vouched for. No one has discredited what he is saying.
He has already provided evidence pertaining this, which has been found 'urgent and credible'. So much so, that there s now a bipartisan push to get the military establishment to reveal what they know. There is a House Intelligence Committee hearing scheduled for 26th July, and a bill to allow for Disclosure has been proposed by Senator Chuck Schumer, whose language is extraordinary. It clearly mentions things like biological evidence, non human intelligence, alludes to historical events, establishes eminent domain over private companies who have access to some of these technologies, and urges government officials to start talking to their international counterparts to enable cooperation on these matters.
These events, coupled with the fact that in the past the Pentagon has confirmed a few leaked videos of UAP to be true, an people like Obama softly acknowledging the existence of the phenomenon, is building a situation where clearly something is going on.
There are several theories, from the alien theory, to the existence of a gigantic financial scam perpetuated by the military, to a deep conflict between government and private aerospace companies, to a psyops effort to prepare for UFO conspiracy theory stuff. Something is going on.

Answer: The legislation in question is an amendment proposed for the National Defense Authorization Act by Chuck Schumer and co-sponsored by a bipartisan group of senators. The Schumer part is a REALLY big deal because he is the Senate Majority Leader and a member of the Gang of Eight. The legislation calls for the immediate transfer of any and all records related in any way, shape, or form to UAPs to the National Archives, where they will be placed in a special collection. A review board will be established, with members appointed by the President, to work through reviewing and declassifying these records ASAP. Notably, the amendment specifically states that there should be a presumption that all records will be declassified and that the panel is basically determining if there’s a reason that certain records CAN’T be. All of the details of this process, timelines, definitions, etc are all outlined in the amendment in iron-clad and minute detail.

This is an incredible development for many, many reasons, but notably that Chuck Schumer would not propose such a “controversial” amendment without being given the ok from the White House (they cannot have Biden vetoing legislation proposed by a Democrat, and the majority leader no less), and because of the seriousness and specificity of the amendment. Tl;dr, they are not messing around anymore and the Schumer amendment would almost certainly result in not only Disclosure but the release of many many pieces of evidence that the government has been hiding for 80 years.

Answer: So, first things first, just because it's in a bill, or somebody said something on the floor of congress, doesn't mean that it's a statement of fact. Congress is full of regular people-- perhaps even over-representing people who are somewhat different than normal (I think you have to have some level of narcissism to survive a campaign for national political office, nevermind win), and they can believe and say anything they want to, on the floor of the house.

Please also keep in mind that everything I will state below is all just *stuff people have said*. Those people may be more or less credible, have certain credentials, a successful career in the military or intelligence agencies, but at the end of the day, all we have right now is what people have said.

There are two factions of people in this series of developments, who we should keep track of: 1. the politicians who express interest or willingness to pursue "disclosure", and 2. The members of the military, intelligence agencies, government contractors, and other employees who claim to have access to documentation -- _and sometimes even the crafts themselves_ -- who are willing to come forward and state those claims on the record.

First, let's look at the politicians. At least one member of Hilary Clinton's campaign, John Podesta, expressed an interest in spearheading UFO disclosure. Campaign members close to the candidate are usually rewarded with cabinet positions if the candidate wins, so he likely would have been able to pursue this.

Hillary Clinton Gives U.F.O. Buffs Hope She Will Open the X-Files

Hillary Clinton Promises to Share Government Info on U.F.O.s

Obviously Hillary lost, so disclosure didn't happen as some had hoped.

Interestingly, President Trump later said in an interview he was brief on Navy pilot sightings of UFOs: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/15/trump-says-he-doesnt-particularly-believe-ufo-reports-1365848

So there is some interest among certain politicians to release more information to the public about what the government may know about UFOs. Interestingly one of those politicians is Senator Gillibrand, the junior senator from New York, who took Hillary's senate seat after she left to run for president-- so Gillibrand may be carrying the torch of Hillary's disclosure plans.

You are probably aware that several years ago, the New York times ran an article about a secret government program to track UAPs, or what we used to call UFOs. In tandem with the article, they also released videos recorded by Navy pilots and other craft operators, of the UFOs, from 2 or 3 incidents in the past 20 years.

The source of this information and the Navy videos is a man named Lou Elizondo, who was the head of that secret program. Long short, he claimed to have quit his position in protest that the military and government weren't doing more to research UAPs and understand any threat they may pose to the US.

After a period of media and talkshow appearances -- as far as I can tell, primarily on UFO and related podcasts-- he left the limelight of media and claimed to be working behind the scenes with others in the government who were willing to come forward.

After this release of information, congress created a new UFO agency and charged it with reporting their findings. In the summer of 2022, congress had the first hearings on UFOs since the 1960s (interestingly lead by then-congressman Gerald Ford, whose constituents in Michigan had had UFO experiences and were unsatisfied with government explanations. This is the sighting where the famous "swamp gas" debunking/explanation originates from).

The findings of the task force at that point were disappointing, to say the least, but one should note that the agency was seemingly underfunded and didn't have a strong enough legal mandate. So the congresspeople who are supporting disclosure moved to give them more funding and a better mandate. That was a year ago.

Meanwhile, Elizondo seems to have been making good on his promise to get other whisteblowers to come forward, and in the past month, the first one has-- David Grusch, an Air Force Intelligence official, who in the past month testified that the US goverment (and others) has recovered crashed vehicles... and the pilots, on some occasions. Again, remember, though he may be credible, and he is testifying under oath, it's still just his story.

He purportedly has provided the documentation to the relevant Senate committees, but those documents are understandably classified.

So now, with the situation seeming to be 1. The military dragging its feet on the official new investigation, 2. at least one additional whistleblower having come forward, and more promised, the politicians who are supporting disclosure are working with those presently-behind-the-scenes whistleblowers, to write new legislation that closes loopholes and has less wiggle room for the military and contractors to wiggle out of.

For instance, if congress passes a new law saying that the military, government agencies, and contractors all have to release whatever information they have on UFOs, they will all say, "That's fine, we don't have anything on UFOs", because the new term for them is UAP. That might sound like a word game, and to some extent it is. But that's the reality that lawmakers have to work with.

THIS IS SPECULATION ON THE PART OF UFO RESEARCHERS. One of the theories you will hear on UFO podcasts is that the US goverment gave recovered craft to military contractors, such as Lockheed Martin and other defense contractors, in order to skirt FOIA laws and other government oversight. Private corporations have much less accountability and obligation to the public. WHAT I'VE JUST MENTIONED IS SPECULATION BY UFO RESEARCHERS.

So pro-disclosure politicians have put language in the Defense Spending bill (the giant and ever-increasing mountain of cash that congress dumps on the military) to attempt to nail down all the UFO stuff, no matter what its called, or who has it, military or contractor. The defense spending bill has popular bi-partisan support, and it contains millions of other things, of which a tiny UFO agency and some new laws regarding disclosure, are barely noticeable. So, that's how these lawmakers have been able to push this through.

There's many more details I've left out, but I can't be writing all night.

The next hearing is scheduled (tentatively) for July 27th! Hopefully a new whistleblower! : D

Answer: A lot of people are mentioning this latest so-called "whistleblower" Grusch, and that's certainly a huge part of the latest craze among the extraterrestrial UFO folks. But I'd like to also point out that this is nothing new. Every year there's another person with a wild set of claims, and they never come to fruition and no hard evidence is ever shared, because these people are always, always, always, 100%, without exception, either crackpots or grifters.

Nothing will eventually come of this. And there's an obvious conclusion to be drawn here, but it'll never, ever cross the minds of all the alien enthusiasts. And the cycle will repeat ad absurdum.