Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, **personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment**. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

**Do you have an academic degree?** We can verify your credentials in order to assign user flair indicating your area of expertise. Click here to apply.

---

Author: u/mvea
URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adf9365

*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.*

I’ve linked to the primary source, the journal article, in the post above. In this comment, for those interested, here’s the link to the press release: https://www.dpz.eu/en/home/single-view/news/wer-schlauer-ist-lebt-laenger.html

It is interesting how many people misunderstand how evolution works.

In a cursory skim through the article I found no reference to evolution of cognitive abilities in humans, and, indeed, this would be highly unlikely.

Living longer makes very little difference (or none) to survivability of genes. All the animal has to do is survive to puberty. In lemurs there may be some (small) correlation with survival to breeding age, but in humans there is little to none.

In humans, certainly, cognitive ability and education tend to be negative selectors for procreation, which is generally seen as a major factor in regression to the mean.