I think that this deserves to be a top level comment. It's in response to this comment in the top voted thread:
>/u/me-meme-account
>
>\>
$1​
>/u/_existentialthreat
>
>Is that true?!
I mean kinda? In reality that money is rightfully our's and everyone other woker (mainly farmers, but also deliverers, packaging, developing etc).
It's sheer profit that the company has access to. But the higher ups have some kind of comission or incentive to cut costs, and the main costs (who let marx in here) is wages. Cut down on that and your profit margins go up. The only way for supplies to become cheaper is if the cost of wage-labour to produce/harvest/extract those supplies goes down.
Example: Say that instead of cutting down on our wages, they want to cut down on supply costs, well the workers that produce those supplies, say coffee or cocoa, need to be paid less.
You might say Ah! What about automation? Well what is automation if not peak wage cutting? But then you might say AH! but what about an increase in that automations efficiency? Well that's not really changing anything. All there doing is selling more, not selling cheaper. Their profit margin hasn't changed unless the cost of wages somewhere in the chain of production is cut.
​
We need to demand fair compensation, their profits be damned. And not just for us, but for every worker.