Bring your karma
Join the waitlist today
HUMBLECAT.ORG

Starbucks Baristas: The daily grind

Full History - 2020 - 04 - 13 - ID#g0s49y
219
the bux has proven that they can afford to pay us an extra $3/hr. (self.starbucksbaristas)
submitted by MikIsDead
are we really going to stand by without saying anything as they take it away mid-pandemic?


this is the first time in my life that i’ve felt that i’m working for a near-livable wage.
me-meme-account 129 points 3y ago
Yeah but it takes a couple thousand off of the year end bonus everyone in corporate will miss out on. So it wont last long. They want their bonuses
_existentialthreat 16 points 3y ago
Is that true?!
might_not_be_a_dog 39 points 3y ago
Where do you think the money is coming from?
UniquePebble 33 points 3y ago
The outrageously priced drinks that are 90% ice?
Onemoagain 5 points 3y ago
I mean kinda? In reality that money is rightfully our's and everyone other woker (mainly farmers, but also deliverers, packaging, developing etc).

It's sheer profit that the company has access to. But the higher ups have some kind of comission or incentive to cut costs, and the main costs (who let marx in here) is wages. Cut down on that and your profit margins go up. The only way for supplies to become cheaper is if the cost of wage-labour to produce/harvest/extract those supplies goes down.

Example: Say that instead of cutting down on our wages, they want to cut down on supply costs, well the workers that produce those supplies, say coffee or cocoa, need to be paid less.

You might say Ah! What about automation? Well what is automation if not peak wage cutting? But then you might say AH! but what about an increase in that automations efficiency? Well that's not really changing anything. All there doing is selling more, not selling cheaper. Their profit margin hasn't changed unless the cost of wages somewhere in the chain of production is cut.
[deleted] 1 points 3y ago
[deleted]
drinkliquidclocks 0 points 3y ago
No shit, where else would it go? Really?
[deleted] -4 points 3y ago
[deleted]
caashmoney 80 points 3y ago
Thank you!!! Let’s not let them forget that they can afford to pay us an extra $3 an hour and give us a month of paid vacation off and it’s no sweat off their back.
princesscupcakes69 62 points 3y ago
UNIONIZE
TheBreckingBall -52 points 3y ago
😂😂😂😂😂 you can’t be serious
Charimia 6 points 3y ago
Absolutely f***ing serious.
Albatross241 21 points 3y ago
I remember seeing in the holiday update that the cardboard sleeve on the paninis was going away and that would save sbux $2mil or something like that. I remember pointing that out to some partners saying “we won’t see a penny of that”
Maybe this $3 is from that, same with cat pay.
But either way my store (FL) has been busier since we shut down our lobby and other non drive thru stores.
I totally agree that they can afford this and should keep it after this is over. Like many of you have said this was what felt like the first liveable wage you’ve seen. This past pay period I had money left over for the first time that I didn’t know what to do with. And it was great.
I don’t know off the top of my head if my district or even my state has announced a date that things will start opening back up but it doesn’t seem like it will happen soon. And I’d hate to be one to say that Starbucks isn’t doing enough but they are now. And it should stay that way.
itspicasso 16 points 3y ago
Has there been talk of them taking it away? I heard it was for as long as the pandemic
HadADreamA1000times 29 points 3y ago
My manager today told us it ends May 3 and when cafes reopen after that date, we have the option of taking a leave of absence, working, or leaving starbs.
thehalima 49 points 3y ago
There’s no way in hell cafe reopens in May.
HadADreamA1000times 14 points 3y ago
Not reopening like before all of this, but non-drive thru stores will be open for pick ups only. No one is allowed to sit inside, we don’t touch anyone, similar to the concept before we closed the cafes and went to the drive thru only system. At least that is what my manager said.
thehalima 18 points 3y ago
Why would we go back to pre lockdown non precautions if we aren’t even in peak yet? I recall asking my sm about cat pay two days before it was mandated and she had no clue. The last people I’d go to for information on this are managers.
xiew 2 points 3y ago
A cafe opened yesterday. I’m about half an hour outside of Seattle. I was working at the only open store in the district and am gonna start working at a different drive that opens tomorrow.
elsha007 7 points 3y ago
As of now, the extra $3 is set to end with catastrophe pay on May 3rd.
RealGregHuman 3 points 3y ago
What if I want my job but not go back that early? What if my store isn't open til way past May 3rd?
elsha007 6 points 3y ago
Everything is up in the air at this point. I doubt they'll extend the catastrophe pay again, but hopefully they'll keep the extra $3. My own cafe store is planning on opening next week as MOP only, but most of my coworkers are choosing to stay at home until May 3rd. After that you can use sick and vacation leave or take an unpaid leave of absence. No one really knows what's going to happen though.
rararat99 12 points 3y ago
And they can afford that while a large amount of their stores are shut and are still paying most of their staff. Even if people at corporate are losing their bonuses this month, they'd have no issue with this raise after they're back to maximum functionality.
It honestly just highlights how shitty they are if they don't maintain it.
MatchingColors 7 points 3y ago
Afford to forever and afford to for 1 month are wildly different. It’s incredible we got a raise at all imo
Onemoagain 6 points 3y ago
I think that this deserves to be a top level comment. It's in response to this comment in the top voted thread:

>/u/me-meme-account
>
>\> $1

​

>/u/_existentialthreat
>
>Is that true?!

I mean kinda? In reality that money is rightfully our's and everyone other woker (mainly farmers, but also deliverers, packaging, developing etc).

It's sheer profit that the company has access to. But the higher ups have some kind of comission or incentive to cut costs, and the main costs (who let marx in here) is wages. Cut down on that and your profit margins go up. The only way for supplies to become cheaper is if the cost of wage-labour to produce/harvest/extract those supplies goes down.

Example: Say that instead of cutting down on our wages, they want to cut down on supply costs, well the workers that produce those supplies, say coffee or cocoa, need to be paid less.

You might say Ah! What about automation? Well what is automation if not peak wage cutting? But then you might say AH! but what about an increase in that automations efficiency? Well that's not really changing anything. All there doing is selling more, not selling cheaper. Their profit margin hasn't changed unless the cost of wages somewhere in the chain of production is cut.

​

We need to demand fair compensation, their profits be damned. And not just for us, but for every worker.
MikIsDead [OP] 3 points 3y ago
preach comrade
coffeeslinger2000 3 points 3y ago
The point was to incentivize people to work so that the people who are actually working weren’t being paid the same as people who decided to take what is essentially a paid leave. If there isn’t that option there isn’t a reason to incentivize people to work. The option would be work or take an unpaid LOA or quit. I’m not saying that we shouldn’t be paid more, but that’s a different conversation. A multi billion dollar company makes billions of dollars because they have a huge number of stores to make that money (among other avenues) and closing down stores loses them revenue as WELL as paying employees that aren’t working. A billion dollars is an insane amount of money for an individual but not for a corporation.
kyle_shrewz 3 points 3y ago
by that logic the company has also proven they can afford to pay us even if we don’t come to work at all. just because they can do something temporarily during a crisis doesn’t mean they can do it indefinitely. the company is running off cash reserves right now and those are finite.
itspicasso 2 points 3y ago
I am transferring to a store that is reopening as of May 13th, so yeah I guess some will be reopening soon
NOTcreative- 1 points 3y ago
They’re diverting pretty much all revenue to partners right now. Facilities and maintenance issues are not being completed to save costs. Not shipping certain things, not building new stores, not hiring and training new managers. What they’re doing right now is sustainable for immediate future during all this but not long term. But believe me there are conversations higher up talking about pay rate for baristas changing.
Charimia 3 points 3y ago
My store is training 2 managers right now, one of them started this week...
NOTcreative- 2 points 3y ago
Never heard of a store manager being able to run a store and train two managers. Are they internal promotions? Was one a transfer? Or was one from a cafe that closed? The other side of it is it’s very likely when we come out of this, many managers might not be coming back so we’ll need managers to run those stores.
papercutrave 1 points 3y ago
Same. My SM is a store manager training and has two ASMs right now. One is being trained remotely (the first ever allegedly).
Charimia 1 points 3y ago
I’m not certain how, but my store manager is almost always training at least 1 manager. We’ve had several complete training and move to their own stores since I started working here. (1 and ½ year)

Right now we definitely have two training for management positions. One is currently performing managerial duties (I believe he was transferred in), and the other is currently learning the store and barista basics, etc.

Edit: added “at least” because of recent times it’s been more than 1 constantly.
[deleted] 1 points 3y ago
[deleted]
NOTcreative- -2 points 3y ago
I get plenty of downvotes I’m good with it. How can you say the issue is corporate greed when they are doing more for their employees than anyone else? 40% of their normal operating expenses are employee wages and benefits, higher than any other major corporation. Even if a store isn’t closed they’re down anywhere from 35-60% in profits. Reopening stores gives them the opportunity to build more stores, develop equipment, and provide the sick benefits package we get.
sadieselby -14 points 3y ago
We have all been getting paid without work...you know how many people have lost their jobs??? Sit down.
leopardsocks 26 points 3y ago
No. That isn’t how change is made. Starbucks is a multimillion(billion?) dollar corporation. Capitalism relies on us sitting down and being oh so grateful for whatever scraps are thrown our way. We have to advocate for ourselves because millionaires and billionaires sure as hell won’t.
We can still feel fortunate for cat pay while criticizing the absurdity that got us here and keeps us underpaid.
Patriciawhack 13 points 3y ago
Ha as if settling is the way to get things done. That like telling Your parents you haven’t eaten in three days and being satisfied with the one French fry they give you. Just because it’s a start doesn’t mean you lie down and take the one French fry because it’s better than no French fries
This nonprofit website is run by volunteers.
Please contribute if you can. Thank you!
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large-
scale community websites for the good of humanity.
Without ads, without tracking, without greed.
©2023 HumbleCat Inc   •   HumbleCat is a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in Michigan, USA.