I'm worried that you are going to have some crazy ppl riot over the fact that they have to wear a mask.

It possibly could increase sales, as people would rather go to Starbucks if they can have a seat inside if the weather isn't to their liking and eat their breakfast rather than have to eat it at home, but I would think it would only be a negligible amount, not to mention not worth the risk to employees' and customers' health. Right, our store manager told us that the policy is that if a customer is seated, they don't have to have a mask on. I haven't done any research into it though. The policy has no time limit on customers' seating--they could sit at a table for five hours with no mask on and not be breaking our policy. I totally agree, that completely defeats the purpose of mask-wearing in the first place--to prevent people's germs from entering the air. If they're sitting at a table and have the coronavirus and breathe it out or sneeze it out, it doesn't matter that they did it at a table more than six feet away from us. It'll travel through our air conditioning system and spread throughout the store. Starbucks also should have never opened its restrooms since toilets spread the virus into the air and who knows what gross things people do in the restrooms. And when they were closed, people would use ours even though they saw a table blocking the hallway to them and signs saying not to. Because people refuse to follow our safety rules, we shouldn't have our store open to walk-in customers.