mayor-em 2 points 2y ago
I see where your going with this but it’s just like the hat requirement. Starbucks doesn’t require baristas to wear hats unless their local mandate does. Anyone can wear a hat, but in my region we must wear a hat. 2 year olds and under can come to Starbucks mask less, unless under the local mandate says they can not.
[deleted] 1 points 2y ago
My understanding is that Starbucks has set its own requirements for being in the store.
From the July 9th update:
> In its continued effort in prioritizing the health and well-being of partners (employees) and customers, Starbucks today announced that beginning on July 15, it will be requiring customers to wear facial coverings while visiting all company-owned café locations in the US.
> At select locations where a local government mandate is not in place, customers that may not be wearing a facial covering will have various options to order their Starbucks, including ordering at the drive-thru, curbside pickup through the Starbucks app or placing an order for delivery through Starbucks Delivers.
They way they specifically mention “locations where a local government mandate is **not** in place” makes me assume that the mask standards are for inside a Starbucks location.
So I would read the Starbucks rule as anyone over the age of 2 is required to wear a mask regardless of the local mandates, be it no mask or a higher age (for example, when I went to Arizona in October, they were only requiring masks for children older than 6), but were also not going to ask children to verify their age.
Just like even if your local government doesn’t have a mask mandate in place, you still need to wear one while in our stores.