Starbucks make about $61.3 million dollars a day in revenue.

> to be *paid* enough to

FTFY.

Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:

* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*

* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*

Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.

*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*

As previously mentioned Fantasticpipe1997 is also me, accidentally posted under a different profile when I switched to my computer to respond.

Reposting my responses from this username as well:

And how many raises has that multi-billion dollar corporation given you in the last, I dunno say 18 months?

Also, per $1, in its fiscal year ending in September 2021, Starbucks spent 305.1 million U.S. dollars on advertising. Meanwhile in the same year Starbucks paid approx. $6,989,300,000 to hourly store partners. Meaning Starbucks used 99.57% more money paying its employees than it spent on Marketing, including customer engagement campaigns like the current Summer Volvo Giveaway (which is sponsored by Volvo, meaning Starbucks did not pay for those cars). My point being you can't be offended when a company doesn't allocate every dime it has available solely to pay you more. Marketing spend is a key part of growing a business and staying relevant, thus keeping you employed.

Lastly, Starbucks spends substantially less than other QSRs on marketing. For example in 2021 Dunkin spent 338.7 million on advertising, 33.6 million more than Starbucks, yet Dunkin has a 1/3 of the stores that Starbucks has. This means in 2021 Dunkin spent $29,973 per store on marketing while Starbucks only spent $9,339 per store, which comes out to $25.58 per day per store.

And how many raises has that multi-billion dollar corporation given you in the last, I dunno say 18 months?

Also, per $1, in its fiscal year ending in September 2021, Starbucks spent 305.1 million U.S. dollars on advertising. Meanwhile in the same year Starbucks paid approx. $6,989,300,000 to hourly store partners. Meaning Starbucks used 99.57% more money paying its employees than it spent on Marketing, including customer engagement campaigns like the current Summer Volvo Giveaway (which is sponsored by Volvo, meaning Starbucks did not pay for those cars). My point being you can't be offended when a company doesn't allocate every dime it has available solely to pay you more. Marketing spend is a key part of growing a business and staying relevant, thus keeping you employed.

Lastly, Starbucks spends substantially less than other QSRs on marketing. For example in 2021 Dunkin spent 338.7 million on advertising, 33.6 million more than Starbucks, yet Dunkin has a 1/3 of the stores that Starbucks has. This means in 2021 Dunkin spent $29,973 per store on marketing while Starbucks only spent $9,339 per store, which comes out to $25.58 per day per store.

the answer is right in-front of you… aka read my follow up.

Edit - I apologize I switched between my phone and computer and didn’t realize I was replying under a different username. FantasticPipe1997 is also me.

Good luck everyone with getting Starbucks to buy you all cars and whatever else you think they should offer as a benefit. Just don’t get fired, cause the grass is not only not greener elsewhere, at many places it’s full of human feces and on fire.

[removed]