Bring your karma
Join the waitlist today
HUMBLECAT.ORG

Starbucks Baristas: The daily grind

Full History - 2022 - 06 - 05 - ID#v5taip
473
my fav modifier now🥰 (i.redd.it)
submitted by kadulee
kadulee [OP] 190 points 1y ago
we are a licensed and a sharpie store so we dont always put the modifier but the amount of drinks that people want blended is crazy during our peaks and rushes. and we only have ONE working blender. ONE. so it feels like just a little bit of revenge LOL
ItzBoogieMan 62 points 1y ago
Hopefully steaming Milk/creamer for coffees will be the same soon
jams1015 47 points 1y ago
Steaming and shaking drinks that don't come shaken need to have the same charge. Stirring doesn't really bother me, probably because it's one of those early extra labor modifiers that slips past my petty-meter because almost no one requests stirred when they could make us shake!
the1noir 2 points 1y ago
If someone wants milk steamed in their coffee then they getting charged a misto
[deleted] -19 points 1y ago
[deleted]
Solid_Wish 34 points 1y ago
Anything over 4 oz is charged but if they want 1/4" to 3/4" of steamed cream or whatever, you do regular add on + the steamed button. A misto is half and half, if you wanna talk standards.
aspiringgrandpa 1 points 1y ago
oh fr? my SM told me to always charge for steamed milk since we’re charging for the ‘labor’ no matter how much it is
s1ythe 107 points 1y ago
At least they put “For iced beverages only”. I remember when I would look at something like that and think that it is unnecessary. Then I started working for Starbucks 🙃
kadulee [OP] 7 points 1y ago
LOL for real
Ordinary-Theory-8289 88 points 1y ago
For anyone who thinks this charge is going to make less people order blended drinks you’re so wrong. Most people probably didn’t even realize they had to option to ask for it, now they’re given the idea straight from the menu. And if it’s 50 cents more it must be good, right?! Hell yeah blend my iced americano baby
herpaslurp 27 points 1y ago
it feels more justified now that the extra labor is being accounted for; at least that's how it works for me in my head.
PeachGreenTea__ 17 points 1y ago
It’s already caused customers to stop ordering so many things blended at my store. It’s a very noticeable decline.
kadulee [OP] 11 points 1y ago
lucky😭 the customers dont even read the menu. they just come up to the register and ask what we have🧍🏽‍♀️
uwumoment 7 points 1y ago
someone blended their bsose like what’s the point in that? the point is it’s shaken, it’s not blended for a reason
orangeygirly 3 points 1y ago
I had someone order their cold brew blended then when he came to pick it up said “I don’t know what blended means”
Ordinary-Theory-8289 1 points 1y ago
Same thing happened to me today with someone’s shaken espresso! She was like “idk if I hit this by accident or what but ….I’m sorry I didn’t want it blended” I was happy to remake it because I was like “honestly I’m so glad cuz a blended shaken espresso is an abomination”
juju483 1 points 1y ago
I think it's more like 65-70 cents at my store (license store in Target so our prices are more expensive anyway)
ittybittybakerkitty 27 points 1y ago
I'd like to add a 50¢ charge for no ice on drinks
Imaginary-Fix-2469 3 points 1y ago
For some reason at my work although I dont work at Starbucks I work at a different coffee shop if someone asks for no ice they charge $2 more lol. Ive noticed $2 being automatically added when I put the no ice modifier.
impasse602 23 points 1y ago
Me too! Cant wait to charge people for caramel drizzle lined around the cup too
Ordinary-Theory-8289 16 points 1y ago
We already charge for caramel drizzle..
impasse602 7 points 1y ago
Yes we do but in the summer 2 training were going to start charging 50 cents for those that want the cup lined with caramel drizzle too
uwumoment 1 points 1y ago
so like for caramel macchiatos?
mommymary 7 points 1y ago
yes, if they want extra drizzle around the cup / cali-style caramel drizzle it’ll be $0.50 extra 😁 i’m pretty sure it’s in addition to the caramel drizzle cost, so 1.20 for extra drizzle on something that doesn’t come with it
dregonzz 21 points 1y ago
Does that mean we can charge $1 for "Double Blended"? 🤣
kadulee [OP] 8 points 1y ago
we actually have a double blended modifier too☠️
pinkyogi 17 points 1y ago
my thing is like,, okay pay US more,,, the laborers and people who are doing the damn blending
CapableArtist123 15 points 1y ago
OnLy fiFtY cEnTs!
raycamaro 7 points 1y ago
Still holding out hope for the PITA button.
raycamaro 5 points 1y ago
Pain In The A__
astivana 2 points 1y ago
Only if it automatically sends that money to the partners as a tip.
tourniquette2 5 points 1y ago
Too bad that 50 cents doesn’t go to our tips.
cush4 3 points 1y ago
I hate that new modifier on Mobiles. A simple refresher has turned into a longer process
brianiwabuchi 2 points 1y ago
“If a mechanic charges for part/labor…” -head office
luvloping 2 points 1y ago
Maybe no water no ice will be coming soon too
sero5074 2 points 1y ago
Are u kidding me 😭
vodwalyn 2 points 1y ago
Here’s my question: if someone wants a blended caramel macchiato do I just make a caramel Frappuccino? If I make a standard caramel macchiato and blend it, do I blend it with the shots or do I just do the shots affogato?
kadulee [OP] 2 points 1y ago
ive been asked to make a blended caramel macchiato so many times. idk what to doo then buddy😭
200lbCookieDookie 3 points 1y ago
Vanilla coffee frapp with caramel drizzle, i guess??
vodwalyn 2 points 1y ago
I mean you’re not wrong, that makes the most sense. But would it be crème base with affogato then??? If we’re going for the macchiato theme
Werten32 2 points 1y ago
That sounds cool but also like EVEN MORE of a pain in the ass
Druid_of_Twilight -43 points 1y ago
I can't belive were charging for this now.. it's not even that common and I feel like it's gonna cause people to just lash out at us, the customers at our store already got upset at the general price increases
badatlife15 36 points 1y ago
It is that common at some stores. And if they want something that requires extra steps/labor they can pay for it. They wanna whine…go somewhere else 🙄
Druid_of_Twilight 14 points 1y ago
Okay then if it was about labor they can also give us a raise 🤷‍♂️ why should the customer pay extra for labor when starbucks isn't willing to
badatlife15 11 points 1y ago
Regardless of our pay, they should still be paying for the price of being an asshole and making something that isn’t standard. From my understanding the drinks are supposed to be designed for standard recipe to be made in a manner that allows us to reach the standards of getting orders out the window quickly and follow sequencing. Making me double blend their refresher and add sweet cream foam is not standard and therefore they should be paying for that. If you (general you here) want something delivered quickly you pay an extra fee, if you want something that goes above and beyond standard you (the customer) should pay for it. It’s obviously common enough that upper management actually did something about it, because it took them long enough to actually make it that drink labels printed out modifications in order of build and not at random.
The_Septic_Shock 7 points 1y ago
Because the day Starbucks pays well will be the day the universe ends. It's Schultz's greed, plain and simple. Heaven forbid they get a linear growth curve and not an exponential one; so they screw everyone under them, customers and workers alike.
The_Septic_Shock 4 points 1y ago
Every licensed store I've been to has that problem. I used to work at one
kadulee [OP] 15 points 1y ago
ı mean yeah you aren't wrong, its bad enough but still
hoewenn 4 points 1y ago
I get why it’s charged though, money speaking. Having to use a blender adds to the electricity bill, so they gotta account for that. Not that Starbucks needs more money obviously, but speaking from a business standpoint that’s why.
SupaFugDup 14 points 1y ago
The $1 used in many Starbucks locations works at 120 volts & 15 amps or 1.8 kiloWatts. Each blend takes 10 seconds (I think?) which gives us 0.3 kWh of energy every usage.

Hawaii $1 the US with an absurd average residential price of electricity of ¢34.3 per kWh. That's 0.083 cents every use.

Maybe maintenance costs are the justification? Vitamix $1 less than 2% of their products under warranty last less than 10 years. The $1,199 blender cost divided up by, idk, 5 uses a day for that time doesn't even break 7 cents per blend.

Labor costs? Store managers in New York $1 earn $52,808 yearly salary, which, assuming a 40 hour week, is $26.40 an hour and 7.3 cents per ten second blending.

These absurdly generous estimates tell us that blending a drink costs no more than 14 cents. Every blend modification is more than 36 free cents in our owner's pockets. That may not sound like a lot but even just selling one per store (of which there are $1!) nets them over a million bucks. Every time.
ItzBoogieMan 10 points 1y ago
Damn r/Theydidthemath
Druid_of_Twilight 0 points 1y ago
A 1400 watts blender uses 1.4 kWh of energy for an hour a usage. That costs and average of 19 cents in the US. That is not a valid excuse to raise the price of the drink as it takes less than 30 seconds to blend something.
hoewenn 5 points 1y ago
Again I’m not saying I agree with Starbucks. I’m saying from someone who loathes but understands the mindset of capitalism, that is their logic. That’s how businesses operate. And keep in mind that 50 cents applies to every drink that can be blended combined. If you have 50+ iced orders that are now blended, that *will* cost money.
Druid_of_Twilight 2 points 1y ago
Yes that's what I'm saying, this is not about helping us account for labor this is about them making money because from those 50 blended drinks they make $25 dollars extra in sales at the cost of running the blender for 30 minutes for only 9.5 cents. And that to me is unnecessary when the company makes billions of dollars in a year in revenue alone.
MeanGreenBeanOnBar 1 points 1y ago
Back in my day a Grande Black Coffee was $1.50 👨🏻‍🦳
This nonprofit website is run by volunteers.
Please contribute if you can. Thank you!
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large-
scale community websites for the good of humanity.
Without ads, without tracking, without greed.
©2023 HumbleCat Inc   •   HumbleCat is a 501(c)3 nonprofit based in Michigan, USA.