why aren't you all unionizing?(self.starbucksbaristas)
submitted by Dillonitis
Seriously if it was a bad idea Starbucks wouldn't fight so hard to stop you from unionizing. You get a say in pay and benefits and guaranteed hours. Every one of you should be looking to unionize.
evviiieeee237 points11m ago
as someone from a unionized store, it’s easier said than done. it creates a very tense and aggressive environment between the baristas and managers. and the union busting has gotten ridiculous. there is also clashing information coming from both sides which confuses those trying to become educated even more. unionizing is an amazing thing but i totally understand why people are nervous to do so.
sleepykilljoy93 points11m ago
also from a recently unionized store. several days were uncomfortable as multiple managers would come in at once, higher ups would linger for a long time, they shut down the cafe for hours at a time making customers angry, sometimes managers were intervening during break times to talk about it, and so much media attention. work felt tense with so many eyes watching you
canidieyet_43 points11m ago
i hated when the higher ups decided to hang out w us after we won our vote. don’t get me wrong, i love my DM….but holy shit was it stressful
uwumoment8 points11m ago
naw we got a new dm and she’s nice and all but… i cannot work with her around lmfaoo
WasUpBoggers2 points11m ago
Is it correct for me thinking that the Starbucks you work at is unionised?
canidieyet_3 points11m ago
yes!
[deleted]1 points11m ago
[removed]
Accomplished-Bad385668 points11m ago
Because there is literally no support network to survive going a month with reduced hours, possible termination (lots of stories about people trying to unionize and being fired for other minor infractions) or waiting for a contract to receive an increase in pay.
For many people is their second job or third place or they have family support. For many others Starbucks is their meager living. Remember that “just go get another job” requires resources that aren’t available to everyone.
Jtimby164 points11m ago
I think because of Union busting. From what I read, if a store does unionize then they will bring in new managers and move shifts around if not just fire them.
I, personally, do not want to deal with that. Also, I make enough as a shift to afford everything including rent, car payment, etc. Especially with a raise next week I see no purpose in my store unionizing. I understand why some in other places where the cost of living is higher would want to though.
BeardiesRule11227 points11m ago
They’re doing this to my store and we aren’t unionizing…. So if you think you’re safe because you aren’t unionizing… think again.
sirencursedwithrage22 points11m ago
where do you live that you make enough as a shift? just wondering for myself because shifts here don't make a livable wage and I'd like to leave this state anyway feel free to pm it to me for privacy idc
thank u
zoidberg300013 points11m ago
Affordable area in Southern California and shifts make $23 starting
Viapache6 points11m ago
Damn I’m west LA and only making 21. Did get hired as a shift tho so idk much
zoidberg30009 points11m ago
I was a manager and was told that our area was a higher pay rate for some reason. I even got paid more than some LA area managers.
camusdreams9 points11m ago
Even in Indiana where minimum wage is <$8, shifts currently start at just under $18/hr and it’s going up $2/hr in a week. And there’s a ton of them at every store it seems. Baristas will be going from $14 to $16. Given the low wages of these states that’s a killing compared to nearly all (if not all) entry level corporate jobs in the US. Not to mention all the benefits. One of my friends has had like $6k in dental surgery for like $200 in his 2-3 years with Starbucks.
mulberrybby5 points11m ago
Upstate NY shifts make $21 ish.
iStealSharpies3 points11m ago
I’m a shift in nyc and I’m at 20… why would upstate make more than in the city?? Cost of living upstate is cheaper… that’s so backwards
seefelix3 points11m ago
Wow I’m just a barista on li and it’s 17 and change. I thought nyc shifts are making 25
Jtimby12 points11m ago
I’m in the Midwest. Rent here is very affordable and I’ll be making around $20 an hour soon which is quite good for this area. I’m only around here for college but the cities I recommend are: -Lafayette IN, I lived here and it was cheap and cool, the Starbucks here are also wonderful -South Bend IN is also pretty cool and the suburbs around it are too -Cities in western Michigan that border the great lake are beautiful but really it gets really cold and there aren’t many Starbucks.
Altogether I’d say look at the Midwest with mid to smaller sized cities that have ~100 - 200k people. Avoid big cities like Chicago, Cincinnati, and Indianapolis because they have a ton a crime. The biggest downside living here is that it gets boring, the weather, and the crazy evangelicals.
rusting_oceans52 points11m ago
dude…. you have *no* idea….
Necessary_Low93944 points11m ago
It’s easier said than done
bottlehalffull39 points11m ago
Because a majority of my team are using the scap benefits and feel like their education will be threatened or taken away with a reduction of hours or being fired. Others fear they will lose health insurance if they are cut hours.
seacamel618 points11m ago
It causes tension between managers and baristas that is toxic. Also a lot of unionized stores are losing their benefits and might not be getting pay raises ? And also if you are a unionized store you won’t see any real change for probably over a year anyways, which I might not even be working at my store in a year. On another note, I am happy with my environment tbh. Yeah my job has issues, and Starbucks is NOT perfect AT ALL. But, I have pretty good pay a good amount higher than other minimum wage jobs. I get good benefits, I have good coworkers and a great manager. I don’t see how unionizing would help me.
On paper unions seem great. But so far the union stores around me have turned into a mess because of fights with management, and workers losing benefits as well as paying union dues, and they actually end up getting paid less than a non union store and having a worse environment.
Just my thoughts, may get downvoted for this but I just think that people are hopping on the union train without doing any research. Let me say that unions are not bad, they can be good in some cases and other corporations like Amazon or somewhere with really poor conditions. But, depending on the situation they may be not ideal! 🙂
Tolkienside15 points11m ago
Them being paid less and treated worse is a product of the company, not the union. Remember that. They'd rather beat you down than allow you an ounce of power.
dayoac8 points11m ago
It is illegal for corporate to take existing benefits from union stores. It is also illegal to threaten to withhold benefits from stores in the process of unionizing. Until there's a contract, there is nothing keeping them from including union locations in the new benefits and pay increases.
Union dues are less than $10 a week for part timers, and until there's a contract, nobody pays them.
Notice how I keep saying "until there's a contract"? Here's the thing: there are no stores with a contract. None. Not a single local pays a cent yet. And when we do finally get contract negotiated, all they would need is a clause saying "we agree to accept all improvements in pay and benefits that are offered to all stores" or something like that.
The worse pay and environment are 100% on corporate. They don't need to fight so hard against us- they're the ones who dug in and turned it into an us-vs-them clusterfuck.
bagels2243576 points11m ago
I agree with you 100%! There is a place for unions in the world, they are not always as beneficial as they seem. I come from a certain market where the unionizing started, and TBH it all has caused my store a lot more harm than good. There have been a lot of “side effects” of the unionizing process and popularity in my market, even though my store isn’t unionized. I say that if you’re satisfied with things and trust your management, there’s no reason to unionize. I think a lot of stores in the country are run well and wouldn’t benefit from it
softvanillaicecream2 points11m ago
who is paying dues? not a single store in the US has a contract yet.
Praxlyn13 points11m ago
Unions don’t solve all problems btw just a heads up
CaptainAndres11 points11m ago
I talk about this all the time at work but at the end of the day I work with a majority of minors and they could care less about bettering the quality of life of baristas and such.
megs128811 points11m ago
Most of he employees at my store don’t plan to make Starbucks a career/there until they finish college, so it would be very difficult to get up going with the influx of newer employees coming in and us leaving.
-Zispy9 points11m ago
For me, I love our manager and we all get good hours. No complaints. I also don’t want to deal with any more than I have to. It sounds like too much work. Theres also possible inconsistencies in benefits, pay, etc, and just sounds confusing. I wouldn’t want to until every Starbucks was on board, it seems like a hassle to me.
whacktherat9 points11m ago
SM told partners they'd close the store down themselves if we decided to.... which idk if they can do, but mfs don't want to lose their job
Workersrights527 points11m ago
This would be so illegal
TheSaltySpitoon-_-8 points11m ago
Because I literally make $20 an hour as a supervisor, which is honestly more than other corporations pay, AND Starbucks gave me 16k a semester for school. I’m so tired of everyone complaining about hourly wage tbh. If you are not happy with how much you get paid an hour, GO WORK SOMEWHERE ELSE. You don’t need a union to tell you that. However, good luck finding another job that offers full benefits covering your school, medical, dental, mental health, offers stock, 401k, free food & drinks every week, free pound of coffee every week, free Spotify subscription etc.., (working at least 20 hours a week nonetheless), not to mention Starbucks is not a career job. You’re not supposed to make a living wage as a barista or a supervisor at a fast food chain. That is why they pay for you, IN FULL, to get a college education. Use it and go get an adult job somewhere else. 🤷♀️ Another super great thing about working for Bux, if you don’t like your store manager and feel you’re working in bad work conditions, you can literally transfer to a different store. Weather it be down the street or across the country. You have a job wherever you go.
[deleted]0 points9m ago
[removed]
[deleted]1 points9m ago
[removed]
[deleted]0 points9m ago
[removed]
[deleted]1 points9m ago
[removed]
[deleted]1 points9m ago
[removed]
slobberingapparition8 points11m ago
my entire store outside of 3 people is so against it they had an anti-union cheer at the end of our last store meeting. so uh. yeah. not gonna happen.
dreamgothgf6 points11m ago
our sm is great and we also are on a college campus which means ability to easily transfer between stores is super important for us. also a lot partners use the healthcare and education benefits and the risk of losing it for the sake of a union isn’t worth it.
onapapersun6 points11m ago
We filed to unionize and the vote resulted in the majority voting no. It caused a great deal of tension between everyone and it made for a terrible environment. I personally couldn't trust that corporate would do any negotiating on good faith and I really didn't want to see benefits being compromised, no matter how many ways one can say they are not supposed to do that.
The only reason why we did is because our SM sucks and we have had issues with her since she joined us a year ago.
Additional_Shoe6 points11m ago
I love my store manager and I love having him work on the floor with us. No one has been able to promise me that he would be able to stay on the floor with us if we unionize
986531W6 points11m ago
It is super difficult to unionize, but if you knew the employee base or are a part of it, know that most of us are pro-union. At my store, people haven't been getting proper hours and they promised us a pay increase at the beginning of summer. Pumpkin spice is going to come out in a few weeks- no pay raise. And the summer and fall are when we are worked to the bone- walk out of the store and it's like you lived a fever dream. And for a store that wasn't unionizing, we also had managers come visit us and had "mandatory training" which was like a 1-2 hr video of our CEO saying "no unionS" cause the company fulfills their promises to us. Man get out :( A lot of us know unionizing is good, union workers have wages 60 percent higher than non-union workers, but it's hard.
I_like_to_know10 points11m ago
If someone's telling you you'll make 60% more with a negotiated contract they're blowing smoke. National average is around an 11% increase, dues can be anywhere from 2-6%, and on average it takes longer than a year to get a contract.
I totally don't agree with Starbucks doing all this shady af union busting and calling it performance management but I really wish partners would educate themselves before voting. I saw one girl interviewed on tv saying that they were going to strike b/c they weren't getting the promised pay increase since they voted to go union. No, once you voted to go union there can be no change in salary without an approved contract. I'm guessing half the people that have voted to unionize won't even work for Starbucks once their contract is formalized.
986531W2 points10m ago
Yeah, you're right about the 60% increase, I don't know where I got that number from. Yours is a lot more reasonable at 11% :) , but anyways, this conversation has so many sides to it, I agree with what you posted.
ValueAffectionate2872 points11m ago
The whole not getting the promised wages isn’t something they can do since they promised the wage increase almost a year ago, I’m in a unionized store and it’s been tough but it’s also protected us from upper management’s BS. ALSO dues are $5 and change for partners under 20 hours and $10 and change for over 20. Respectively equaling approx. $10-$20 / month for protecting your job. Especially worth it in right to hire/right to fire states. Anyways. I hope you have a splendid day :))
bekalh5 points11m ago
my district in upstate NY has pretty good pay and amazing management. everyone is happy, everyone uses the benefits, no one is really looking to change anything. i understand this is not the case everywhere, but we’re pretty content
edit: im also just a student, i don’t plan on staying forever
defendtrevornoah4 points11m ago
because I don’t want to work here forever, quite frankly..
ModeMore33754 points11m ago
Threads like this are just reasons to downvote opposing opinions. r/unionizestarbucks is --> way
Dillonitis [OP]3 points11m ago
Thanks.
ModeMore33753 points11m ago
You're literally just shitting on all dissenting opinions. The union hardos do that at every store that's another reason people don't do it.
MrsOceanGrown4 points11m ago
When you post something on here, your opening it up to everyone’s opinions. Wether you like it or not. I think it was pretty harsh to BS someone’s opinion.
Logical-Doubt-60213 points11m ago
union busting and I have a pretty good sm
Aware-Vehicle19262 points11m ago
Sounds like you haven’t been gaslit by management enough
Toal_ngCe2 points11m ago
We don't need it; my store has a great manager and we don't have any issues rn. Also I feel like people don't know what to do once they unionize; I'm seeing stuff in here abt unionized stores losing benefits which is VERY illegal but it also feels like noöne's reporting it to the right people. A union is a tool to fight injustice towards workers but if you don't use it then it's basically just a tension machine.
PlantVader2 points11m ago
I live in a collage town and so the partner turnover doesn’t justify the career befits of unionizing. I absolutely support other stores with older adults to unionize but for a collage town with a lot of turnover I can’t justify it in my head. Would love to have a discussion about it though if anyone is in the opposite situation as me.
Zealousideal-Star4482 points11m ago
Yea I’d be for unionizing except because you can’t borrow partners or be a borrowed partner I’m not down for it. If it was a district by district thing I’d be more down but I’m not because of it Edit: also the fact that no one is allowing it to be done right just pisses me off and I would rather not and wait for others to deal with it. Most Unions have a 3rd party to do the negotiation and all the contracts and shit. It seems like it’s just random baristas doing it
Additional_Shoe3 points11m ago
I wouldn’t be able to work at different stores if we unionize?
Zealousideal-Star4481 points11m ago
That’s what manager has stated multiple times. She also said it makes transferring more difficult
Workersrights521 points11m ago
That is 100% not true. You CAN borrow partners at unionized stores, transfer stores, etc. I know this for a fact because I work at a unionized store. Starbucks is literally just lying and trying to scare people. It’s also partners sitting at the bargaining table, not a third party. The lines above sound right out of the mouth of Starbucks’ union-busting lawfirm, Littler Mendelson.
Additional_Shoe1 points11m ago
Thank you for clearing that up! That makes me feel better. Would you also be able to shed light on store managers and having them work on the floor? Is there really no way for them to work on the floor as part of the team in unionized stores?
ETA: someone also told me they can’t chat with you without a rep being present? Truth or scare tactic?
bagbicth2 points9m ago
That’s false. When you bargain you can bargain for that. They’re just making up lies to scare you.
HiiAlberta1 points11m ago
Ehh, I believe the belief on union benefits vary from store to store. Unions are ultimately a trade off in the allocation of assets to workers. Unions often have a more effective say in negotiating better favor of workers. That is also the reason why many dont like unions, it makes it hard individuals to negotiate their own wage or benefits. This may mean benefits offered will be limited as the union may not be able to even bargain effectively (which does in fact happen).
Roarkshop1 points11m ago
From a store that's not unionizing, we have been watching the efforts closely and have noticed that as soon as a store unionizes, many of the store managers are quickly fired for not stopping it. We happen to be very lucky and really love our store manager and she does her very best to take care of us so we are currently just trying to protect her however we can
rlogranite1 points11m ago
I can negotiate my own pay. I don't need a union. Lol
Flowerfuls1 points11m ago
My store couldn’t because they didn’t try to go all together. The leaders kept everyone else out of it. Then couldn’t even do the basics. It’s hard to get a whole store on the same page and if you can’t then there isn’t any point. As much as I’d like to do it I also have SCAP that I can’t risk losing rn. And I can’t follow the leaders who just want to keep things in their tiny little cliche 😕
IndividualCorner15861 points11m ago
Instead of unions can we push for the asu online programs to expand a bit more also I like my job
[deleted]1 points11m ago
[deleted]
Frail_Peach1 points11m ago
Because there is no guarantee that I won’t get paid LESS than the company offers. Having a “say” in your pay doesn’t guarantee you an increased wage
Dillonitis [OP]16 points11m ago
That's straight bullshit. They can't pay you less than they are already paying you. Why do you think they union bust so hard. Because they know they will have to pay up.
HamburgIar_14 points11m ago
It's bs? Why don't you check out the first ratified union contract in the UK for Starbucks stores. They negotiated an increase in wage. Starbucks then increased wages company wide but the store had already agreed to a set wage that was less than what Starbucks increased all other stores to.
You need to do some research and base your arguments on facts and not emotion. Most stores don't want to negotiate an increase in wage at the risk of losing ASU benefits or something else. A lot of stores have terrible management and need to unionize BUT there are a lot of good managers that treat their employees well. Those stores don't see a need to unionize.
throwaway1209340987-3 points11m ago
From what I understand, the only way a union could lose ASU benefits would be if Starbucks took it away for everyone. Starbucks can’t offer certain benefits only to non-union workers, despite what they make it sound like. The difference is that the union just has to agree to the offered benefits. Starbucks can’t get around that. And it wouldn’t make sense for them to get rid of ASU across the board just to punish the unionized workers.
Dillonitis [OP]-1 points11m ago
Just because you have good management doesn't mean you don't deserve to be paid for your work. Starbucks pays less than McDonald's and Target for a more stressful work environment. I would rather go to community College and make a livable wage than use ASU. At least then you aren't worried about your bills and being on the brink of homelessness if you miss time at work or something else happens.
VirtualPen991211 points11m ago
Why don’t you just go work at Target or McDonald’s then? I don’t understand why you’d work for a company you think is so awful, there are so many opportunities and jobs out there.
I legitimately would like to know, If Starbucks is so bad, why unionize and why not just go get a better job?
Frail_Peach7 points11m ago
Also I should clear up I’m not anti union at all, just wary of big change that can affect my monthly budget
Frail_Peach4 points11m ago
But say you get paid the same but on top of that owe union dues, that would equate to making less I feel, right?
Dillonitis [OP]5 points11m ago
That's the point of negotiating and union dues aren't an expense to be worried about if you are making a livable wages instead of borderline homeless wages.
Frail_Peach13 points11m ago
But the opportunity to negotiate doesn’t come right away but dues are owed immediately, and again, just because you have the opportunity to approach the bargaining table doesn’t mean you’re guaranteed a wage increase
iStealSharpies4 points11m ago
Idk why you’re getting downvoted, this is literally true. The union committee in my store are bargaining for $25 dollars an hour. There’s literally no guarantee that they’re gonna grant us that.
KiwiBeginning40 points11m ago
Because everyone I work with is republican
wobbysobby0 points11m ago
Our store was the first to unionize in my state, and we’re being punished for it. Our raises are being implemented later than other stores just because we’re union. They are also giving us the new benefit rollout late. It feels petty.
Thanks for the downvote…? Just giving my experience.
LackOfColor_0 points11m ago
Right before I quit, the letter from Ross Ann came out on the hub essentially begging partners not to unionize and saying it’s a bad idea.
I now work for a Union and told that to one of my coworkers and his response was “that’s how you know it’s time to unionize”
Do it people
espressojunkie0 points11m ago
What’s funny is the unions are actually working. Starbucks now has to compete and is bumping pay to $15 an hour minimum plus adding more benefits. Not sure that would be happening without unions. There is however this image especially with the old school auto unions where people are basically taking advantage, doing little work, and getting paid a ton. I’ve dealt with NYC labor unions and they are awful, labor is uber expensive, they’re basically do-nothings, and they give unions a bad rap. I think there can be a middle ground where a union can make working conditions better without going to extremes
awkward_cat_man_0 points11m ago
I’m trying to unionize my store. I’ve been in contact with several partners. And I’ve been secretly speaking with my coworkers too. It’s going to happen and I’m going to make it happen.
IzzyIllustrations0 points11m ago
Everyone at my store is under the impression that our store is perfect so we don't need to unionize. Even when i bring up the benefits and the fact that we'd be negotiating with the company and it has nothing to do with our specific stores management, they don't want to for the simple fact of we have an amazing manager. It makes me sad because they're eating up the bullshit starbucks is pushing. So no, unless every store unionized, our store absolutely would not.
greenChainsaws0 points11m ago
because my coworkers are not immune to propaganda.
Our mission is to provide everyone with access to large- scale community websites for the good of humanity. Without ads, without tracking, without greed.