celloqueer 2 points 11m ago
Full disclosure, my store is not currently unionized, but even without that personal experience I know enough to know that’s fearmongering.
-“it’ll take months to get a contract” yeah that much is probably true bc negotiations take a long time, but in the meantime you’re operating under the default conditions like where you have been working.
-“benefits could go away” this is one of the #1 things Starbies higher ups are fearmongering about to create uncertainty about. In theory your store could choose to trade X benefit for whatever, but the union is the workers, and if you were to be one of the workers at that location you would get a say in that negotiation. “The union” isn’t a third party that’s going to randomly be like screw you you lose this thing. You get to be in it and advocate for keeping the shit that’s important to you. And additionally if Starbies tried to stick it to y’all and withdraw benefits for that store as a random screw you, they can get sued, and so far Starbies hasn’t been faring well when people go at them over the union related labor violations.
-re: transfers this is a bit of a relative unknown bc unions are new, but even if you would have to do that, former partners get hired back all the time assuming there wasn’t bad blood with them and their manager resulting in weird stuff in their file.
IMO those issues shouldn’t keep you from working at that store if you otherwise feel good about it.
fuwaldah 2 points 11m ago
> Can anyone speak to this?
No. At this point, little is known about what will be in the contracts or how Starbucks will handle (or be able to handle) transfers. I also in general support most unions. This might be unpopular to say, but this union is no like most unions. Starbucks has behaved abominably, but my experience with the union so far has been pretty abominable as well.